Search: Affective Justice: Book Symposium: A Response

[Alexandre Skander Galand is a Post-Doctoral Researcher at the Centre for Fundamental Rights at the Hertie School, Berlin.] On 3 April 2022, President Zelenski announced that he ‘approved a decision to create a special justice mechanism in Ukraine for the investigation and judicial examination of every crime of the occupiers. The essence of it is the joint work of national and international experts: investigators, prosecutors and judges.’ It is still unclear whether this ‘special justice mechanism’ will be in the form of, as proposed by Heller and Owiso, a hybrid...

of liberal construction does not mean that the court can ignore a clear failure in the pleading to allege facts which set forth a claim currently cognizable in a federal district court. The International Court of Justice “is a[j]udicial arm of the United Nations.” The International Court of Justice does not have jurisdiction over criminal cases and collateral attacks on convictions.. The jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice is limited to disputes between nations. It should also be noted that the above-captioned case is barred by the Foreign Sovereign...

Prize Cases and Presidential Order establishing the Military Commissions are similar examples. What is disheartening in all four is that while the executive engaged in excess neither the Congress nor Supreme Court engaged or challenged the President. Checks and balances fell by the wayside; Justice Jackson’s famous warning of an ‘unfettered executive’ went unheeded. As the three branches of government move into the post Bush era they would do well to recall not only Justice Jackson’s words but also those of the former President (Chief Justice) of the Israeli Supreme...

recourse for victims of heinous crimes committed overseas, offering them a path to justice that may otherwise be inaccessible. In the wake of the current global atrocities, the TVPA exemplifies how domestic laws can effectively embody international legal standards, serving as a vital link between disparate legal systems. The TVPA’s integration into international law discourse is far from theoretical; it represents a tangible effort to ensure that survivors of international offenses are empowered with a voice and a means to seek justice. As such, the TVPA could serve as an...

To have your event or announcement featured in next week’s post, please send a link and a brief description to ojeventsandannouncements@gmail.com.  Calls for Papers Nottingham International Criminal Justice Conference : The University of Nottingham School of Law, in partnership with the International Criminal Justice Unit of the University of Nottingham Human Rights Law Centre, is organising a conference on 8–9 July 2024 that will bring together people working across the diverse field of international criminal justice. At this interdisciplinary conference, we are aiming to foster connections between academics, practitioners and...

with.] This year marks 15 years since Sri Lanka’s brutal decades-long civil war ended. There are credible allegations all sides to the conflict committed serious human rights and international humanitarian law (IHL) violations, including incidents of sexual violence, torture, extrajudicial killings and enforced disappearances. The victims/survivors of these violations still await justice. Sri Lanka attempted to grapple with the past through transitional justice (TJ) processes, but these have largely failed. In the absence of meaningful accountability efforts in Sri Lanka, the international community has stepped in to a limited extent...

...they are committed — applies to his acts and thus justifies punishing him (“justice can be helped to triumph by the proper application of this penal law”). That does not make the authors of the amicus brief Nazis. But it does mean that the amicus brief is relying on the same kind of analogical reasoning that was at the heart of the Nazis’ perversion of the German criminal-justice system — the same kind of analogical reasoning that was specifically condemned as itself criminal by American judges in the Justice case....

...of Justice and Interior are responsible for the crimes of aiding and abetting Elmasry to evade justice (Art. 378 Criminal Code, CC) and of embezzlement of public funds for the use of the Italian intelligence’s plane to repatriate him to Libya (Art. 314 CC). Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni announced in a video that she has been served with a notice of investigation. Under Italian law, a notice of investigation constitutes a procedural prerequisite not implying any finding of criminal wrongdoing on the part of the recipient but aiming to guarantee his or her...

[Margaret V. Sachs is the Robert Cotten Alston Professor of Law at the University of Georgia School of Law and an expert on securities law] The Supreme Court yesterday issued its decision in Morrison v. National Australia Bank, its first ever on the international reach of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5. Justice Scalia wrote for the Court, with additional opinions by Justice Breyer (concurring in part and concurring in the judgment) and Justice Stevens, joined by Justice Ginsberg (concurring in the judgment). Justice Sotomayor did not participate. The federal securities...

Justice O’Connor’s views on international law and foreign law are moderate, well-reasoned, and consistent. Julian points out two quotes and implies that, somehow, they don’t fit together in a “[]satisfying” world view. I disagree. On topics of international law, Justice O’Connor has consistently held that U.S. judges should, in certain instances, give persuasive authority to international tribunals. It is also her view that they do not have to do so as no international or foreign tribunal has been given judicial authority by the Constitution. It is not necessarily a view...

...monitoring, and denouncing abuses. They have exposed corruption, famine, environmental destruction, and systematic human rights violations, while standing in solidarity with victims seeking justice. Without their work, the long road toward accountability would be even more difficult. Against all odds (and often at great personal risk) they have gathered the evidence that may one day be used in courts to bring those responsible to justice. When I worked at Free Press Unlimited, managing the Legal Defense Fund under the Reporters Respond programme (funded at the time by the Dutch Ministry...

[Dinah PoKempner is General Counsel of Human Rights Watch. She is writing in her personal capacity. Views expressed in this essay are not necessarily those of HRW.] Increasing judicial recognition of a duty to investigate and even to prosecute serious violations of international law is unlikely to narrow the ambit of transitional justice; to the contrary, it adds pressure for more thorough transitional measures by upping the reputational cost of impunity. Not even two decades have passed since agreement of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, arguably a...