Search: Affective Justice: Book Symposium: A Response

it. This says nothing about Adams’ power had France attacked the U.S. The Tripoli incident in 1801 is the first clear episode raising the issue, and the book discusses it at some length. (Professor Kent and I have different interpretations of it, but the bottom line is that Jefferson’s cabinet – Madison included – approved an offensive response, Jefferson ordered an offensive response, the navy made an offensive response, and Congress, informed of the navy’s instructions, raised no objection). So in the response-to-attack issue, I don’t mean to devalue post-ratification...

options for justice and accountability are available and which would most appropriately address atrocities of the past and those that continue to be perpetrated? Over the next week, Justice in Conflict (JiC) and Opinio Juris will co-host a symposium that delves into these questions and sheds light on ongoing atrocities and political violence waged in Libya. Contributors will outline why Libya finds itself in the violent political quagmire that it is in today. Options for justice that will explored include the creation of an independent investigative mechanism, additional action by...

[Karen J. Alter is a Professor of Political Science and Law at Northwestern University and a Permanent Visiting Professor at iCourts. Laurence R. Helfer is the Harry R. Chadwick, Sr. Professor of Law at Duke University, and Permanent Visiting Professor at iCourts.] This Opinio Juris blog engages our findings about the Andean Tribunal of Justice, published in our book Transplanting International Courts: The Law and Politics of the Andean Tribunal of Justice (Oxford University Press, 2017). Our book is a deep exploration of a fairly obscure international court, which is...

[Natasa Mavronicola is a Professor of Human Rights Law at Birmingham Law School, University of Birmingham; co-editor of Coercive Human Rights: Positive Duties to Mobilise the Criminal Law under the ECHR (Hart 2020); author of Torture, Inhumanity and Degradation under Article 3 of the ECHR: Absolute Rights and Absolute Wrongs (Hart 2021). Mattia Pinto is a lecturer at York Law School and Deputy Director of the Centre for Applied Human Rights, University of York. Forthcoming book: Human Rights as Sources of Penality (OUP).] ‘Justice demands that the accused be prosecuted,...

institutional actions, performative aspects of criminal procedures, and repair of harm. He argues that expressivism is not a classical justification of justice or punishment on its own, but rather a means to understand its aspirations and limitations, to explain how justice is produced and to ground punishment rationales. This book is an invitation to think beyond the confines of the legal discipline, and to engage with the multidisciplinary foundations and possibilities of the international criminal justice project. After Carsten introduces the symposium, we have fantastic posts lined up by Diane...

a dramatic function: not only that of “doing justice,” but that of “making justice seen” in a larger moral and historically unique sense’.   There are well-extolled virtues to having justice rendered publicly: transparency breeds trust, and a better understanding of the concrete proceedings and experience of justice. Virtually opening the doors of the Peace Palace puts a face on all actors involved, from lawyers to judges, on all sides, de-mystifying international justice and letting it enter the viewer’s reality. In this sense, even the small incidents we have witnessed –...

Amnesty International, for  the UK  to conduct “an effective and transparent investigation into the allegations made against the UK Special forces in Afghanistan, that delivers justice for victims and holds the perpetrators accountable.” Also, predictably, nothing has happened. These new allegations against the UK Special forces come at a time when there are renewed and invigorated commitments to international justice. Just recently, the call by the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court (ICC) for additional funding for the situation in Ukraine  was met with an overwhelmingly positive response from Western...

...did not hold high-ranking positions within the security apparatus, the symbolic significance of former regime officials being brought to justice and one of them, thus far, actually being sentenced for his crimes is huge: it shows to Syrian victims and the world at large that justice may be delivered. Such an outcome may also encourage other people to file cases in countries willing to fulfil their obligations under international law and bring those allegedly responsible to justice by applying the principle of universal jurisdiction. This principle allows a State to...

in the Pre-Trial Chamber’s assessment.  First, as a procedural matter, as mentioned, the Pre-Trial Chamber appears to have engaged in its own de novo review of “the interests of justice,” rather than reviewing submissions of the Prosecutor. Second, the Pre-Trial Chamber’s ruling conflicted with the plain language of the words “the interests of justice,” which sound something like “so that justice is done.”  It seems a perversion of the concept to dismiss an investigation that can lead to judicial proceedings “in the interests of justice.” Third, the Pre-Trial Chamber’s ruling...

to his inevitable prosecution. I do not know enough about Yoo’s actions to venture a general opinion about their possible criminality. I do know something, however, about the Justice Case -– I am currently writing a book for Oxford University Press on the jurisprudence of that trial and the eleven other trials held in the American zone of occupation between 1946 and 1949, which are collectively known as the Nuremberg Military Tribunals (NMT). So I thought readers might be interested in a detailed look at what the Justice Case says...

its future influence on jurisprudence.So, once again, one must ask, why is that left wing of the Supreme Court willing to risk so much for so little? Is this all the sake for intellectual honesty? That seems to be a little ridiculous. We all are, after all, Supreme Court justices included, shaped by countless influences to be enumerated. To be consistent, should Justice Thomas explain how his status as an African American affects his jurisprudence while Justice O'Connor explains how her experience as a legislator explains her jurisprudence while Justice...

article that eventually became this book. The new symposium is much more ambitious and will feature contributions from the following scholars: Susan Biniaz Laurie Blank Daphne Eviatar Shaheed Fatima Jean Galbraith Jenny E. Goldschmidt Sean D. Murphy Stephen Pomper Rita Simieon Rachel Stohl Dire Tladi Beth Van Schaack Mark Wu Sam Zarifi We will post Harold’s introduction tomorrow morning and the first comment tomorrow afternoon. We will then post two comments on the book each weekday until we run out of comments. At the end of the symposium — or...