I expect very little from the media in terms of legal accuracy, particularly concerning the ICC. But this article — reproduced in one form or another in dozens of newspapers — is still a doozy:The International Criminal Court may try former Namibian president Sam Nujoma and three others in connection with the disappearance of hundreds of people. A local newspaper...
"What's Canada for?" This may seem like an odd question, but one to which Michael Byers, a lawprof at the University of British Columbia and director of the Liu Center for Global Policy there, has a clear answer. Canada should exist in order to pursue a progressive, international-law abiding foreign policy. So says his new book entitled:...
"Justice delayed," William Gladstone once said," is justice denied." True enough, but there is a competing adage: "better late than never." The latter clearly applies to the tragic story of an Australian aborigine who was awarded more than $400,000 last week for being stolen from his family as a child:"The best thing is knowing they never forgot me,...
Another little news item that I forgot to post about this week: A court of appeals in Paris on Wednesday released two Rwandans from custody despite acknowledging both were the subject of arrest warrants issued by the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR). Not surprisingly, the Rwandan government (already barely on speaking terms with the French government) is not...
Professor Flaherty’s recent post is a great one in getting at the essence of my view and our disagreement, and a fitting way to wrap up the discussion. I do believe in a coherent Constitution. Not a perfect Constitution, for the text surely has redundancies, gaps and contradictions on particular matters, as well as substantive flaws. But I think...
Professor Kent’s additional comments helpfully clarify his textual argument on the power to respond to attacks. I now see (I think) that he is relying on a negative implication: the President must not have this power because it would vitiate important powers of Congress. I do think this is a more promising approach than trying to jam the...
Russia has been busily working to take possession of half of the Arctic Sea (or at least the seabeds under half of the Arctic Sea). In a dramatic mission covered heavily by Russian television, the Russian government has planted a titanium Russian flag on the seabed underneath the Arctic Sea. (I'm still looking for photos of the flag on...
Thanks again for the excellent comments. Here I’ll take up those offered by Professors Spiro and Ku. I agree with Professor Spiro that historical textualism can only go so far in answering modern questions (assuming one wanted to use it that way), and that some contemporary perspective is inevitable. But I think it goes a...
I am happy that any disagreement Professor Ramsey and I have regarding history is more a matter of degree than of kind. That said, the matter of degree may well be greater than even he acknowledges. To that extent, I believe he may oversell a number of the ostensibly textual points he makes in his work. The agreement in...
Jack Goldsmith had this op-ed in yesterday's FT, in which he argues a convergence on anti-terror thinking among Americans and Europeans. The Europeans, on the one hand, appear now to understand that ordinary criminal processes won't do the trick, where the US is coming to understand that anti-terror practices will be subject to law. Here's the money graf:These...
One of my major purposes in discussing Professor Ramsey’s treatment of the scope of the president’s power to respond to attacks was to suggest that here, on this topic, his book may not meet its goal of giving dispositive interpretive weight to the written constitutional text as understood by Americans at the time of ratification. To the extent, then,...
I’ll join the chorus praising Michael Ramsey’s work, both the book The Constitution’s Text in Foreign Affairs and his scholarship over the course of more than a decade. Mike’s is an important and distinctive voice in the foreign relations law community. It is refreshingly agenda-free. As Martin Flaherty points out, his conclusions don’t line up neatly...
