The Great Firewall of China

The Great Firewall of China

Clive Thompson has a detailed and enlightening story in The New York Times Magazine this weekend on Chinese censorship of the Internet. It definitely is worth a read. There are plenty of juicy tidbits that are fascinating (e.g., China has its own version of “American Idol” known as, I kid you not, “Mongolian Cow Sour Yogurt Super Girl Contest.”). But three sections of the piece are particularly interesting.
First, Thompson emphasizes that China is quite proud of its censorship. He relays a story of an American businessman who attended an award ceremony held by the Internet Society for China in which ten Internet service providers received the “Self-Discipline Award” for excellence in censorship. “They gave them a plaque. They shook hands. The [Chinese] minister was there; he took his picture with each guy. It was basically like Excellence in Self-Censorship — and everybody in the audience is … clapping.”

Second, Thompson does a brilliant job of succintly explaining precisely how the Chinese authorities use technology to censor.

When you use the Internet, it often feels placeless and virtual, but it’s not. It runs on real wires that cut through real geographical boundaries. There are three main fiber-optic pipelines in China, giant underground cables that provide Internet access for the public and connect China to the rest of the Internet outside its borders. The Chinese government requires the private-sector companies that run these fiber-optic networks to specially configure “router” switches at the edge of the network, where signals cross into foreign countries. These routers — some of which are made by Cisco Systems, an American firm — serve as China’s new censors.

If you log onto a computer in downtown Beijing and try to access a Web site hosted on a server in Chicago, your Internet browser sends out a request for that specific Web page. The request travels over one of the Chinese pipelines until it hits the routers at the border, where it is then examined. If the request is for a site that is on the government’s blacklist — and there are lots of them — it won’t get through. If the site isn’t blocked wholesale, the routers then examine the words in the requested page’s Internet address for blacklisted terms. If the address contains a word like “falun” or even a coded term like “198964” (which Chinese dissidents use to signify June 4, 1989, the date of the Tiananmen Square massacre), the router will block the signal. Back in the Internet cafe, your browser will display an error message. The filters can be surprisingly sophisticated, allowing certain pages from a site to slip through while blocking others. While I sat at one Internet cafe in Beijing, the government’s filters allowed me to surf the entertainment and sports pages of the BBC but not its news section.

Third, there is an interesting discussion of the compromises that Microsoft, Yahoo and Google make to do business in China. The story notes that, unlike Microsoft and Yahoo, Google has refused to offer email and blogging services since that could put them in a position of being forced to censor blog postings or hand over dissidents’ personal information to the secret police. According to one of the top bloggers, Zhao Jing, Google has a good reputation in China but Yahoo is “a sellout.” Yahoo puts individual dissidents in serious danger, while Google has avoided introducing any service that could get someone jailed. The former is committing sins of commission, the latter sins of omission.


If you are interested in the issue of Chinese censorship, it is a must read.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Topics
General
No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.