In association with the International Commission of Jurists

Search: palestine icc

31 Oct

...proposal, Eurocentric ideas were used to justify slavery, colonialism, theft of cultural artefacts, and unbridled interference in the affairs of countries in the Global South. This is also reflected in how the international community responds to international conflicts and determines which civilians are worthy of protection. A glaring hypocrisy is the reaction to the conflicts between Ukraine and Russia on the one hand, and Israel and Palestine on the other. In the former case, there was a swift rallying of support behind Ukraine, a European nation that was on the...
31.10.25 | and |

11 Oct

...with academic institutions to integrate these topics into their curricula. Leverage the ICJ Advisory Opinion: Develop strategies to leverage the ICJ Advisory Opinion on Palestine by emphasising its findings in international legal forums and political advocacy. Use the opinion to support legal actions, shape diplomatic strategies, pursue corporate accountability, and pressure states to adhere to its conclusions. Strengthen Legal Actions at the ICJ and ICC: Intensify efforts to bring Israeli actions before the ICJ and ICC, focusing on the genocidal aspects of their policies. Compile and present comprehensive legal documentation...
11.10.24 | , , and |

09 Apr

...openly pro-Palestine Ivy Leaguers. And so, “wait a minute!”, the white Progressive mind thinks, “I am also pro-Palestine Ivy Leaguer!” There is thus something very self-serving brewing just barely under the surface of the urgency with which this fight for US democracy is taking shape – and it is worth exploring further. As the white Progressive elites claw themselves to the bulwarks of due process and fundamental rights and declare that the battle for the soul of America has begun, they also seem to ignore that for many others, the...
09.04.25 | |

19 Jul

...pre-state British Mandate which approved the establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine, without specifying its borders. To further the claims of Jewish settlers, the committee recommends streamlining bureaucratic obstacles to construction in the Jewish settlements, retroactively approving homes built without permits and relaxing restrictions on building on land claimed to be privately owned by Palestinians. Without subscribing to the recommendations of the Levy Committee or its justification for Israel’s territorial claims to the West Bank, I enthusiastically endorse its candor. For decades, Israeli government lawyers have argued that the...
19.07.12 | |

31 Mar

...the University of Southampton on April 17-19th will engage controversial questions concerning the manner of Israel’s foundation and its nature, including ongoing forced displacements of Palestinians and associated injustices. The conference will examine how international law could be deployed, expanded, even re-imagined, in order to achieve regional peace and reconciliation based on justice. The conference is intended to broaden debates and legal arguments concerning historic Palestine and the nature, role, and potentialities of international law itself. Participants will be a part of a multidisciplinary debate reflecting diverse perspectives, and thus...
31.03.15 | |

22 Jul

I opened Facebook just now to find the following post from my brilliant student at SOAS, Tamara Tamimi, whose MA dissertation — written under my supervision — received the law school’s award for the best MA dissertation of the year: I am angry, frustrated and sad. I was denied entry clearance into the UK to attend my graduation from SOAS University of London. I finished my MA in Human Rights Law from SOAS, University of London ten months ago and returned to my homeland, Palestine. I decided to go through...
22.07.17 | |

04 Apr

...occurred “in the course of” armed conflict between Israel and the PA. This lawsuit, and six others with identical facts, will most likely go forward. Whether these lawsuits are helpful in ultimately resolving the Israel-PA conflict is less likely, especially when a U.S. court has to rule on questions such as Palestine’s statehood and the legality of its attacks under international law. But the victims have an undoubtedly powerful claim here and it is hard to say no to them, especially when the statutes plainly authorize these kinds of lawsuits....
04.04.06 | |

26 Jul

...a prior controversy involving HRW and the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. HRW criticized Palestinian officials for urging civilians to serve as human shields. Anti-Israel commentators, led by rabidly anti-Israel activist Norman Finkelstein, went ballistic. So how did HRW react? Did Ken Roth say, “We report on Palestine. Its supporters fight back with lies and deception.” Did Middle East director Sarah Leah Whitson accuse HRW’s critics of racism? Not exactly. HRW instead issued an abject apology. In fact, if you try to find the original press release on its website, you instead find...
26.07.09 | |

28 Sep

A federal district court in Washington has ruled that the answer is no. In Biton v. Palestinian Interim Self-Government Authority, the court ruled that it had jurisdiction over the Palestinian Authority, and that recent developments do not confer sovereign immunity on defendant. The defendant argued that: We recognize that the court previously has held that [D]efendants are collaterally estopped from arguing that Palestine is a “foreign state” for purposes of the ATA. New developments, namely an Israeli court’s recognition that the [Palestinian Authority] is entitled to immunity and the Israeli...
28.09.07 | |

26 May

...Serbia. Israel could claim Iran has violated Article 3(c)’s prohibition on “direct and public incitement to commit genocide.” Still, even though it seems as if Iran’s president Ahmadinejad probably would like to annihilate Israel, I’m doubtful whether a claim for “inciting” genocide without any actual hostile actions that might constitute genocide will “succeed.” Moreover, Israel is just opening the door to a similar claim brought by Palestine (see here for a detailed roadmap for just such a suit) and can look forward to several years of very slow ICJ litigation....
26.05.06 | |

15 May

...ICC's Rome Statute in order to handle a specific case before them. In the future, if G.W. Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice, and others were alleged to have authorized or abetted war crimes (e.g., torture and cruel, inhuman treatment of detainees) and crimes against humanity (e.g., secret detention) in Afghanistan, which is a party to the Rome Statute, and another party refers the case to the ICC, I do not believe that the ICC would have to address the entire conflict in Afghanistan and/or elsewhere in order to address the specific...
15.05.13 | |

02 May

..."war"). But, however that may be, no statement to the effect that the US is "engaged in a war" could possibly provide any legal justification, either for any use of force in the sense of Article 2(4) of the Charter, or in any other sense (disregarding for a moment the possibility of a derogation from the ICCPR under its Article 4 - which is not openly dependent on any state of "war", and which in any event has never been declared). For present purposes of the attack in (arguably: on)...
02.05.08 | |