Search: palestine icc

...International Criminal Court (ICC).” In this way, these countries can contribute towards shaping the ICC’s role in promoting international justice to address serious crimes, which may extend to include ecocide. The appropriate international forum for criminalizing ecocide is the Assembly of State Parties to the ICC, which can amend the Rome Statute to include the crime. International criminal law has scope to prevent ecocide and other environmental crimes despite the legal, practical and conceptual challenges (see Sarlieve 2020; Mackintosh 2020) It is a new area of international law with an...

My friend and PhD supervisor Carsten Stahn has posted a very interesting discussion of Libya and the ICC at the Hague Justice Portal. Here is a taste: One possible option to reconcile domestic jurisdiction with accountability before the ICC may be a division of labor based on temporal jurisdiction. In line with the Council referral, the ICC enjoys jurisdiction as of 15 February 2011. There is no conflict of jurisdiction with respect to crimes committed prior to that date. To frame accountability in light of this distinction may, however, pose...

and human rights advocates who consistently overstated the benefits of international criminal tribunals without serious efforts to offer evidence of these benefits. Sadly, the ICC’s arrest warrant against Sudan’s leaders demonstrates our point. At least in the short-term, the ICC’s action is going to worsen the humanitarian crisis rather than improve it. And it will make a peace agreement harder to reach, extending the conflict. Professor Tom Ginsburg of University of Chicago calls this the ICC’s “make or break” moment. I’m not so sure about that, but it is true...

...treaty, and, perhaps unsurprisingly, one dominated by ICC States Parties. Only Rwanda is non-states party to the ICC. This largely mirrors the diplomatic negotiations that led to the adoption of the Convention. In May 2023, of the 80 Supporting States, more than half were European. There were none from the Middle East and only three from Asia. The MLA Initiative was dominated by ICC States Parties throughout; only 7 of the Supporting States were non-States Parties. So far, it has been difficult to attract support beyond Europe.  Reservations Possibilities for...

its investigation into Myanmar on the crime of forced displacement, is the ICC opening the doors to an examination of various states’ immigration policies? (Almost certainly, Myanmar will argue that the Rohingya are not lawfully present in Myanmar—most Rohingya having had their citizenship stripped through a series of prejudicial citizenship laws—thereby requiring a future ICC inquiry into Myanmar’s domestic citizenship laws.) While immigration is an area historically relegated to the sovereignty of individual states, perhaps the ICC is signaling that even abusive immigration practices are not safe from international accountability....

...the practice is surprisingly absent from the ICC Prosecutor’s preliminary examination reports on the situation of Palestine. In her 2015, 2016 and 2017 annual reports, Fatou Bensouda mentions house demolitions only under the heading of “settlement activities” which would seem to exclude punitive house demolitions. The ICC does not have jurisdiction over the war crime of collective punishment as such. The case for including this crime in the Rome Statute has already been convincingly argued, but it was not proposed as an amendment at the 2010 Kampala Review Conference. However,...

of the Geneva Civilians Convention, “The High Contracting Parties undertake to respect and to ensure respect for the present Convention in all circumstances.” The states party thus bear a collective responsibility to ensure compliance. They convened, in fact, in July 1999 in Geneva, at the call of the Government of Switzerland, to consider Israel’s violations as belligerent occupant in the occupied Palestine territory. That session was adjourned at the request of Palestine President Yassir Arafat to facilitate direct negotiations with Israel, but it could readily re-convene. A conference of the...

...Israel has conspired with the West and with European international law in pursuit of Palestine’s dissolution, both literally and figuratively. Imagine that, prior to the West’s adoption of its Partition Plan, the territory of Palestine covered 100% of historic Palestine. Yet, following the land’s bizarre bifurcation, the Nakba, Israel’s endless wars, the expansion of settlements by both state and settler militias, sequestration, and myriad other technologies of elimination, Palestine is today less than 12% of what it was (and a shrinking fraction of the 45% afforded in the Partition Plan):...

...the historical context of their ongoing suffering and struggle: “Genocost” and “Nakba”. These terms highlight that “genocide” for both Congolese and Palestinians is a continuous process, not a singular event. Many organisations are pushing for campaigns against genocides in DRC and Palestine, particularly Al-Haq and the Congolese Action Youth Platform (CAYP). Due to the campaigns by Al-Haq and CAYP, the term “genocide” has gained traction among social media users globally, deployed to describe the atrocities in both Eastern DRC and Gaza Strip in Palestine. At the time of this writing,...

...ICERD should not be understated … the two concepts and the two Conventions are joined at the hip.’ CERD, Apartheid and Palestine v Israel While CERD has been active under its EWUA procedure, it notably has yet to reach a decision in Palestine v Israel, likely to be the first inter-State case to be decided by a UN treaty body. Among other aspects, Palestine v Israel urges CERD to reach a determination that the situation in the Occupied Palestinian Territories constitutes apartheid in violation of Article 3 ICERD, which reads:...

that the PTC was badly fractured, with one of the judges believing that the ICC has no jurisdiction over the Palestine situation, even though all three judges actually agreed on that critical point. Just imagine if the headline read “ICC Rules Unanimously It Has Jurisdiction to Examine Possible Israel War Crimes.” Or, even better (don’t get me started on this one): “ICC Rules Unanimously It Has Jurisdiction to Examine Possible Israeli and Palestinian War Crimes.” The difference is obvious. The New York Times can — and must — do better....

...not have been, and wasn't, a "High Contracting Party" to that 1949 Convention so that too is problematic for the application of its terms to a country/state that never existed. I will not enter into another problem: that the leader of the Arab community in the Palestine Mandate himself committed war crimes in aligning the Arab movement in Palestine with the Nazis, engaging in war crimes and sending agents back into the Palestine Mandate to fight the Allies there. Another legal concern is that the League of Nations decision was...