Search: palestine icc

certain elements of the alleged crimes had been committed in the territory of Lithuania itself, which is a State Party. It is well-established that the ICC has jurisdiction when a crime is committed in the territory of a State Party or when the perpetrator is a national of a State Party. But does the ICC have the territorial jurisdiction over crimes that are conducted on the territory of a non-State Party, and if so, what are the conditions required to establish said jurisdiction? Establishing ratione loci jurisdiction of the ICC...

been a team effort (including legal officers) along the lines of the Guidelines for ICC Judgment Drafting (Annex to the Chambers Practice Manual, see especially paras. 25 et seq.). A second example is the decision of the TC to “render any potential decision on sentencing pursuant to Article 76 of the Statute simultaneously with its judgment under Article 74 of the Statute” (Decision on Sentencing Procedure, para. 2). It has been the preferred option at the ICC so far to hold a separate sentencing hearing, which prolonged the proceedings (for...

I know, fisking pro-Bashir propaganda is kind of a pointless task, but the article made me mad with its shameless inaccuracy. It’s unfortunate that so many Arab readers — the original article was published in the Al Rai Jordanian Daily — are exposed to this kind of garbage concerning the ICC and Darfur. Without further ado, the fisking… Jurists and politicians participating in the seminar held for analyzing legal stance of the International Criminal Court versus Sudan have come out with the conclusion that the ICC step is more of...

...have taken up, and continue to take up, a lot of space before the ICC and account for a non-negligible part of the “hard work” some ICC people take unique pride in relentlessly boasting – or complaining, depending on the audience – about. This said, and answering your questions, I think it is indeed unacceptable that Judges “create” procedural rules based on their discretion and that it is high time to stop this exercise and to go back to basic and solid legal interpretation. On the question if “judicial creativity”...

the internal law of the ICC Statute which the ICC must comply with, given that, for the reasons set out above, treating the NUG as the government of the State of Myanmar is consistent with all the different relevant areas of international law and, indeed, a sui generis rule of international law adopting such treatment as a legal norm that may well have been established, the object and purpose of the Statute, to end impunity, requires the ICC to accept the Declaration as valid for the purposes of Article 12(3)....

the ICC particularly after the AU issued a resolution last July instructing its members not to cooperate with the Hague tribunal in apprehending Bashir. But Mbeki appeared to distance himself from the position of the pan-African body in his report seen by Sudan Tribune. “The ICC is a ‘court of last resort’ as well as of limited practical capacity: it can only target a few people for prosecution. Indeed, conscious of its limited resources, the Prosecutor of the ICC has adopted a policy of focusing only on those few who...

just world’, embodying ‘humanity against crimes’. In Ba’s characterisation of the same decade, the ICC does not warrant grandiose celebration, it is so deeply implicated in unjust politics that it ‘may need to acknowledge that it can only deliver justice that is…political, selective, and partial’ (Ba, 2020, p. 159). The ICC, then, appears as impervious to its status as ‘a court in permanent crisis’ (Ba, 2020, p. 158). It is apt then, that, on International Justice Day this year, the ICC launched a ‘resilience’ campaign. Encountering this with Ba points...

...remit of its investigation before pursuing a case. In September this year, an official diplomatic note was sent by the Argentinian Ministry of Foreign Affairs to the Office of Fatou Bensouda, the Prosecutor of the ICC, asking for additional information. MoFA has specifically asked for clarity on whether the Prosecutor believes a universal jurisdiction investigation would duplicate, or could even be disruptive, to the ICC’s own investigation. We believe the answer is clear: a case in Argentina would complement the ICC investigation, and should be opened immediately. The investigation the...

O-Gon Kwon a letter expressing displeasure with the selection process and the shortlist of candidates. The letter cited, and expressed support for, paragraph 33 of the Resolution ICC-ASP/1/Res.2 (as amended by resolution ICC-ASP/3 /Res.6), entitled “Procedure for the nomination and election of Judges, the Prosecutor and the Deputy Prosecutors of the International Criminal Court,” which stipulates that “every effort shall be made to elect the Prosecutor by consensus.” Such consensus, the letter added, must be achieved through “open and transparent consultations.” The letter went on to explain why the process,...

...humanity, representing 2.2 percent of all accused. This is in sharp contrast with the pattern at the ICC before which, at the time the article was written, 11 out of 30 accused were charged only with crimes against humanity in the Kenya, Libya and Côte d’Ivoire cases, representing a stunning 36.7 percent of all accused. Turning to a more normative and qualitative assessment of the data, the article postulates that the increase in “CAH only” cases at the ICC is to be expected because the ICC is a permanent court,...

not join, nor does it have any plans in the near future to join, the ICC. 2) The U.S. will seek to remain engaged in the ICC as an observer, and will no longer seek to obstruct or oppose ICC investigations and other works. Indeed, it will cooperate with the ICC (as in Sudan) in certain cases. 3) The U.S. will oppose — strongly oppose — the current definition of “aggression” that may be adopted by the ICC at its Kampala review conference as well as the addition of “aggression”...

this will be a crime against humanity subject to the jurisdiction of the ICC. Too many acts and omissions, too long, in too many places. Best, Ben Kevin Coffey Whether the ICC has jurisdiction to prosecute the Vatican is questionable. Vatican City is not a State Party to the Rome Statute. The only way the ICC can have enforcement authority to prosecute is through the Security Council referring the matter to the court or the Vatican itself willing to accept the ICC's jurisdiction (both hugely unlikely). Politically, it is also...