In association with the International Commission of Jurists

Search: extraterritorial sanctions

05 Apr

...believe international law does not constrain covert operations, at least from the perspective of U.S. domestic law. First, we must remember that Title 50 operations may be authorized as an integral part of an armed conflict or in the absence of one. Thus, IHL may or may not be triggered and apply to a covert operation or program, and IHRL would apply only to the extent one accepts (contrary to long held official U.S. views) that IHRL applies to a nation's extraterritorial actions. Regardless of whether either body of international...
05.04.13 | |

18 Apr

...the plaintiffs to re-file their complaints against the US defendants to overcome the new Kiobel extraterritoriality presumption. This means that she is willing to explore in greater detail the Kiobel requirement that plaintiffs’ claims “touch and concern” the territory of the U.S. with sufficient force to displace the presumption against extraterritoriality. Will knowledge by the US parent of the subsidiaries’ activities in South Africa be enough? Will receiving profits from the subsidiaries be enough? I assume that is the best the plaintiffs will be able to plead is knowledge by...
18.04.14 | |

25 May

...(if, in my view, unfortunate) position that ICCPR doesn’t apply extraterritorially (which the report acknowledges), this seems a bit of a tough legal case to make. Beyond the trial situation (to which it seems CA3 would surely apply), as long as we’re choosing between legal regimes the United States officially rejects, why not pick APII, or API by analogy, as the more useful standard? Truly asking here. Finally (for now, I’m still catching up), former State Department Legal Adviser John Bellinger and his former State Department colleague (and soon-to-be Vanderbilt...
25.05.11 | |

04 May

...armed attacks by non-state actors not amounting to armed conflict -- to be governed by human rights law, particularly extraterritorially. In such cases, states may observe IHL as a matter of policy or by analogy but had no requirement to do so as a matter of law. This, I think, is Jordan Paust's position, and somewhat reflects the U.S. position (depending, perhaps, upon the administration). While I respect Kevin immensely, he frequently argues, without citation, that no European country views the law this way. Absent a thorough study, I can't...
04.05.11 | |

13 Apr

...the British Right, and particularly on the more 'conservative' newspapers - and, of course, on the yellow press of whatever persuasion. The Conservatives have even vowed to repeal the Human Rights Act if elected. Not that they seem to have the faintest idea what the Act does, mind you... da23will There's certainly a strong policy argument against extending the extraterritorial application of HR treaties too far if it means that states are going to refrain from arresting pirates on the high seas, for fear that they'll be unable to return...
13.04.08 | |

09 May

...the substance of what is being punished to make an accurate evaluation. I am not sure how helpful it is to level broadside attacks based solely on labels. Additionally, I would encourage you to consider my recent Journal of International Criminal Justice article regarding the municipal, common law basis of some offenses in the MCA...and the next one in that Journal (if accepted, currently pending) regarding the propriety of their application to conduct in an extraterritorial armed conflict - particularly given the legality principle (for those unfamiliar, similar to ex...
09.05.09 | |

13 Mar

...this has nothing to do with civil law and common law - if you do not charge your English cousins to have become civil lawyers. Certainly, I also regard Afghanistan/Pakistan as an armed conflict, albeit of a non-international character. Consequently, they are a matter of criminal law, including its extraterritorial application, subject to the strictures of common article 3 of the Geneva Conventions and the customary law of Article 75 Additional Protocol I. Other terrorist acts have been simply that - heinous and cowardly crimes, some of them of an...
13.03.09 | |

17 Oct

Bo Rutledge Further to Roger's excellent post, readers should recall that the SG has filed on these sorts of issues before. When the South Africa cases first went up on cert, the SG took the unusual step of filing an unsolicited amicus brief in support of cert [Disclosure - I represented and continue to represent an amicus in that case]. The guts of that brief argued that the ATS did not authorize extraterritorial assertions of jurisdiction on the basis of aid/abet liability. I have always admired the principled nature in...
17.10.11 | |

13 Jun

Francisco F. Martin I haven't read the Boumediene decision or the Halliday and White article (and, therefore, do not know if they mentioned any admiralty cases), but aliens captured extraterritorially (whether on the high seas or in foreign territory) were and are entitled to habeas relief by federal courts sitting in admiralty by virtue of the savings to suitors clause of the 28 U.S.C. sec. 1333 (first enacted in the Judiciary Act of 1789). I do know that some of the Gitmo detainees were transported by ship and/or captured by...
13.06.08 | |

27 Mar

...origins of U.S. thought on the applicability of human rights in armed conflict. Apart from the historical U.S. view, my suspicion is that a true empirical (both qualitative and quantitative) analysis of state practice in armed conflict would yield scant data supporting the extraterritorial applicability of most human rights law (meaning other than crimes against humanity) or its broad applicability in even internal armed conflict. If that is historically true or at least debatable, then in my humble opinion the burden is not on the Obama administration to demonstrate the...
27.03.10 | |

23 Jan

...obligations under the United Nations Charter, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and the Convention Against Torture. The article also provides an Appendix that sets forth a Torture Timeline 2001 – 2007 and addresses standards for criminal complicity that would be applicable concerning criminal or civil sanctions against members of the prior Administration who are clearly reasonably accused. [forthcoming, 18 Barry L. Rev. (2013)] The Bush-Cheney Legacy: Serial Torture and Forced Disappearance in Manifest Violation of Global Human Rights Law – Jordan J. Paust Introduction I. Rejection of...
23.01.12 | |

17 Nov

...of his choice. While sloppy thinking may be endemic to the debate, one hopes the judge will sort things out. "Terrorists" have no more or fewer rights than bank robbers, but a non-citizen captured and held overseas and then tried for some sort of extraterritorial murder is not entitled to certain procedural rules (with regard to things that happened in foreign countries) that would apply to a resident accused of a murder in the US. One may believe that civilian courts would be more likely than military courts to make...
17.11.09 | |