Search: extraterritorial sanctions

...yet consider the rise of universal jurisdiction over recent years all over the world, which includes African countries such as Senegal exercising universal jurisdiciton over Hissene Habre, former dictator of Chad (There is video footage of a mission of the International Federation for HUman Rights to Chad on FIDH's website, but I cannot post the link..) It also includes the US adopting relevant legislation (see Opinio Juris posts), Canada, Chile and numerous European countries (see REDRESS/ FIDH, Fostering a European Approach to Extraterritorial Jurisdiction, 2004, Fostering a European Approach to...

...have died in Iraq. We are witnessing a yearning for the domestication of war.'Here we agree! It’s a bad trend. Let’s all together try to establish a just, stable, impartial and efficient international criminal justice system, so that individual states don’t have to create their own extraterritorial prosecution rules. Wait a minute, maybe we just agree on what’s the statu quo, not on how to solve its deficiencies.'For its part, it appears that United States refused to cooperate in the Spanish investigation. Had it done so and been able to...

...Court in Quirin and Yamashita, among other cases. It also has not been superseded by domestic legislation or conventional IHL, though I wish to do more research and theoretical work on this. By the way Dave...in the follow-on article to this one I have just mentioned (which discusses the propriety of applying this domestic common law to conduct in an extraterritorial armed conflict under both domestic and itnernational law), I cite your military commissions article a fair amount. If you are interested in reviewing the next article before I submit...

...cloud' of the fighters. How do we know which cloud reigns supreme? I doubt the notion of IHL being the lex specialis would apply here. A clash of clouds and proportionality doctrines indeed. RJ1983 There equally seems to be a problem in the assumption that IHRL is applicable to the operations of a State on foreign territory. The substantive HR obligations are limited to territory and jurisdiction, and the HR bodies and courts have been very reluctant to accept extraterritorial application of human rights. Sure, HR has an impact on...

...armed attacks by non-state actors not amounting to armed conflict -- to be governed by human rights law, particularly extraterritorially. In such cases, states may observe IHL as a matter of policy or by analogy but had no requirement to do so as a matter of law. This, I think, is Jordan Paust's position, and somewhat reflects the U.S. position (depending, perhaps, upon the administration). While I respect Kevin immensely, he frequently argues, without citation, that no European country views the law this way. Absent a thorough study, I can't...

...from genocide and crimes against humanity, they do not believe that all gaps in the express protections of international humanitarian law are filled by international human rights law -- particularly in extraterritorial aspects of armed conflict. The reason for the latter view -- in full disclosure one that I share -- is that modern international humanitarian law consists of conventional and customary constraints on what might otherwise be considered a proper measure to defeat an enemy. In other words, it generally requires that the measures employed in armed conflict be...

...Israel's considers) there is no occupation there is simply no law to apply (reference to general principles of law will not get someone very far, whereas Israel -- along with other States -- does not recognise extraterritorial application of its ICCPR obligations in accordance with that instruments basic text). In any event, the provisions of the Fourth Geneva Convention that Israel does apply are its humanitarian provisions (see Ajuri and Others v. Israel Defence Force Commander, 125 I.L.R. 537, 547, ¶ 13 (Israel H.Ct.J. 2002)). shmuel Ori, "if (as Israel’s...

...section 1605A has an extraterritorial scope; it is not limited to claims related to acts of terrorism within the United States. Even before the terrorism exception was first adopted in 1996, a US federal court had interpreted a different section of FSIA (section 1605(a)(5)) to find that Chile was not entitled to immunity in connection with a political assassination – an act of terrorism – on US territory (Letelier v. Republic of Chile, 488 F. Supp. 665 (D.D.C. 1980)). The key difference between the existing regime and the proposed amendment...

Francisco F. Martin I haven't read the Boumediene decision or the Halliday and White article (and, therefore, do not know if they mentioned any admiralty cases), but aliens captured extraterritorially (whether on the high seas or in foreign territory) were and are entitled to habeas relief by federal courts sitting in admiralty by virtue of the savings to suitors clause of the 28 U.S.C. sec. 1333 (first enacted in the Judiciary Act of 1789). I do know that some of the Gitmo detainees were transported by ship and/or captured by...

...three part functional test for the extraterritorial availability of the Great Writ: "at least three factors are relevant in determining the reach of the Suspension Clause: (1) the citizenship and status of the detainee and the adequacy of the process through which that status determination was made; (2) the nature of the sites where apprehension and then detention took place; and (3) the practical obstacles inherent in resolving the prisoner’s entitlement to the writ." The Court has not emphasized citizenship too heavily in its decisions regading the general availability of...

...offences’ are defined as inter alia extraterritorial offences “which [constitute] an offence under the law of another state [presumably the territorial state] and which would have constituted [terrorism] … had that activity taken place in the Republic”. To my mind, at least, that conditions SA’s UJ in Okah to offences that were also offences under the law of Nigeria (loosely ‘double criminality’). There is another contender for UJ however (section 15(2)), which states in relevant part that any act [NOTE: not ‘specified offence’] committed outside the Republic shall, regardless of...

...does not reflect international law despite the assertion that it does], which expressly does not apply to section 404, etc., etc. -- and Moxon and Bolchos had extraterritorial aspects that the majority opinion ignores -- such as the fact that foreign flag vessesls are the equivalent of foreign territory wherever the happen to end up and the fact that a violation of international law can take place elsewhere in some cases but the vessel ends up in a U.S. port). Despite the shocking 9-0 ultimate vote, errors must be addressed...