Search: extraterritorial sanctions

...as special adviser on public international law for the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court. That court, as is well known, has issued indictments against high level officials of the government of Sudan, including its chief of state. The Security Council has, to date, ducked all pleas by the ICC Prosecutor to assist the Court in enforcing these indictments, even though the Council could easily do so under its Chapter VII authority, including its existing sanctions regime for the Sudan under Security Council Resolution 1591 (2005). What would TWAILERs’ advice...

...and legitimise UNGA actions. Part 2 asks what action the UNGA should take in light of this report. Specifically, whether the UNGA has the legal authority and should recommend UN Member States to issue sanctions against Israel until it fully complies with the ceasefire agreement, and whether states following those recommendations can do so legally. Independent Commission of Inquiry Report 2025 The Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem, and Israel (“the Commission”) was established on 27 May 2021 by the Human Rights Council....

...coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity. It does not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to lawful sanctions. The US Torture Statute (18 USC 2340) is similar: “torture” means an act committed by a person acting under the color of law specifically intended to...

...would allow it to predict, to the extend feasible, potential human rights violations. As such, the duty to identify potential adverse human rights impact does not entail harm-based civil liability. It is an obligation of result, and non-compliance has certain consequences for the corporation. These can take the form of administrative sanctions/remedial action by the monitoring body established pursuant to Articles 17-18 of the Commission’s Proposal; or sanctions/ remedial action ordered by a civil court if the national civil /torts law allows for such a procedure, as is the case...

...efforts to bring about significant improvements in the conditions in Sudan through sanctions against the Government of Sudan and high level diplomatic engagement and by supporting the deployment of peacekeepers in Darfur. This Act purports to authorize State and local governments to divest from companies doing business in named sectors in Sudan and thus risks being interpreted as insulating from Federal oversight State and local divestment actions that could interfere with implementation of national foreign policy. However, as the Constitution vests the exclusive authority to conduct foreign relations with the...

...and for Ukraine v. Russia in Crimea) and issues of non-intervention (e.g. Qatar v. UAE on sanctions and travel bans against Qataris) to be complained of under the cover of racial discrimination, ethnic cleansing, cultural erasure, targeted murders and torture as well as other human rights protected by the CERD. The strategy is to cleverly re-characterize the dispute around racial discrimination in order to pass the step of jurisdiction ratione materiae. A clear example of this reformulation would be Ukraine’s argument in the Ukraine v. Russia case that “while it...

...that more harm could be done to the value of international humanitarian law by throwing in a referral to the court as a way to garner support for sanctions against Khartoum. Goldsmith says that “even though criminal courts have done little to bring reconciliation to Rwanda or the former Yugoslavia,” or even “deter future crimes,” it is nevertheless “possible that the concrete threat of an ICC prosecution could temper the killings in Darfur without adversely affecting the recent peace deal…” While he seems to recognize that this is a pretty...

...authority to enforce the Laws of the Game in connection with the match to which he has been appointed.” Next comes the FIFA Disciplinary Code, which is an extraordinarily complex set of rules regarding everything from doping, to fan conduct, to rules against incitement to hatred. The sanctions that can be imposed are quite interesting, ranging from a warning to a stadium ban to forfeit. An entire article could be written on these obligations and the sanctions that flow from violations. Then there is the FIFA Statute, which as noted...

...that an action on the basis of the procedure under Art. 265 TFEU was brought against the EU institutions for their inaction concerning Israel’s breaches of international law in the OPT. According to the applicant, the EU institutions unlawfully failed to act following its letter of 12 May 2025 in which the association requested: a) the suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement; b) the adoption of sanctions under Art. 29 TEU; c) a formal review of all co-operation activities with Israel; and d) the adoption of a clear public position,...

...term (p. 282). The books states that sanctions are measured by “substantially equivalent” trade concessions (p. 283), but does not explain where the term “substantially” comes from as it is not a term from the treaty or the jurisprudence. In addition, the book posits that the WTO dispute system provides gap fillers for an incomplete bargain that approximate what WTO members would have negotiated had they been able to address the contingency in the treaty text (p. 284). But the book fails to note that the WTO judges do not...

...a recent Senate report. A group calling itself “Official Cyber Caliphate” said it hacked the official website of national carrier Malaysia Airlines, but the airline said its data servers remained intact and passenger bookings were not affected. North Korea on Friday demanded the lifting of sanctions, imposed by South Korea after a 2010 attack on one of its naval vessels, as a condition for resuming dialogue. Europe Spain will start talks with the United States about further increasing the number of U.S. troops at an air base in the south...

...two most distinctive features of Kelsen’s jurisprudence, namely: (1) that the nature of law is essentially tied to its use of sanctions, and (2) that the normative force of law was only explicable by reference to a non-natural transcendent fact, what Kelsen called the Grundnorm. Contra Kelsen (and Austin), Hart argued that linking law’s nature to the use of sanctions misrepresents law’s normativity; and on the second point, Hart offered an account of law and its apparent normativity in terms that were exclusively psychological and sociological–in terms of what legal...