In association with the International Commission of Jurists

Search: crossing lines

10 Apr

Socrates While the US-India deal does not violate any written portion of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, it certainly undercuts the treaty. The compromise at the heart of the NTP is that countries which renounce any right to build nuclear weapons are allowed civilian nuclear technology that they would not otherwise have access to. For this reason, the international community attempts to prevent the sale of nuclear material to non-NTP states. The export of nuclear material is constrained by the guidelines of the Nuclear Suppliers Group and by US law. What...
10.04.06 | |

24 Jul

...prohibition should be taken quite seriously. Certainly not that Kansas was alone crossing the line, though it illustrated some of the reasons for the prohibition. Gov. Sebelius seems to have pushed further than some others, but none of these agreements should be allowed without the approval of Congress, per Article 1 Section 10. As for FARA, it has been getting some more attention lately, including the AIPAC cases, the Chi Mak and related cases (in which Bill Gertz has refused under subpoena to reveal his grand jury sources), and Stephen...
24.07.08 | |

21 Oct

...is of sufficiently high value. Kevin Jon Heller With regard to Kunduz, I think there is no question that the attack would have been disproportionate even if unwounded Taliban were there. Richard Galber To expand the rules regarding the attacking hospitals risks the potential of creating even greater risk of using hospitals for combat purposes. The main deterrent to attacking hospitals is not via legislation and/or treaties, but by international public opinion. Countries are terrified of losing any international support they may have, so are wary of crossing certain lines....
21.10.16 | |

07 Aug

...any actual enemies charged with providing support to the enemy in violation of the laws of war (that didn't involve personally committing acts of violence)? The Quirin saboteurs' crime was crossing our lines of defense in disguise, etc. (There were lots of cases like that during the Civil War, too, I think.) Was Hamdan accused of anything like that? John C. Dehn Jennifer, I think you made the point very well that the marauders, pirates and the like are not objects of IHL as Bart suggests. They violate the universal...
07.08.08 | |

07 Jun

...is a crucial difference between a reasonable legal argument, and an argument which is merely arguable, in the sense that language or precedent can be twisted beyond any recognition. Let me just give you an example - the OLC/John Yoo conclusion that Afghanistan was a 'failed state' and therefore ceased to exist as a subject of international law, thereby obviating any treaty obligations the US might have. This argument is so totally and obviously wrong that any lawyer making it is crossing the basic bounds of professional ethics. It is...
07.06.07 | |

01 Jun

...focused on. The law on use of force draws some sharp lines between being subject to armed attack and virtually everything else. Do indices like this suggest that we should stop treating armed attack, and the possible use of force in response thereto, as being so singular? Kevin Heller My thanks to Ed and Patrick. As for "NewStream Dream" -- you might want to re-read the description of the blog. Last I checked it said that Opinio Juris is "[a] weblog dedicated to reports, commentary, and debate on current developments...
01.06.07 | |

04 Jun

...israel would also have the power to inspect any ships crossing into gaza's territorial waters. that itself wouldn't constitute a 'blockade', as israel would be the de facto authority over gaza's land, sea, ports, crossings and civilian population in that case. israel can't rightfully blockade itself. if israel isn't an occupier (as israel claims), then either one of two things is going on: 1) israel is asserting it's security presence within gaza's territorial waters according to the gaza-jericho agreement in which case israel's navy also has the right to stop...
04.06.10 | |

14 Nov

...residents at the time the crime was committed. Then again, since so many American criminals flee to Canada, maybe this will serve to make a few people think twice before crossing the border. Nick Donovan It's time to start thinking about shared funding models for extra-territorial jurisdiction investigation and trials. Crimes against humanity are deemed to be NOT crimes that are committed in a particular state. Yet the costs fall solely upon the state on whose shores the suspect happens to wash up. This gives prosecution and international crimes some...
14.11.09 | |

11 Aug

...I think we would need multiple attacks to conclude that MH17 was just the byproduct of a policy of firing at everything that flew. Alex Whiting Kevin, I see this as possibly fitting under your (2). It might have been the desire of the perpetrators to shoot down military aircraft, but if they then proceeded to shoot at airplanes without regard for the nature of the target, then we have a war crime. In Galić, the Trial Chamber considered evidence that after the SRK discovered that ABiH soldiers were crossing...
11.08.14 | |

21 Mar

...(I assume, for instance, that someone can be legally admitted as a dead person into the United States where she couldn’t have entered as a live one) Your corpse is not a person, it's a lump of meat, with a few legal protections regarding desecrating it. I don't see any reasons aside from health concerns that it should be barred from crossing country borders. Why would you deny someone's request to be buried in your country? Peter Spiro Matthew, I assume you're right, and I can't think of any reason...
21.03.07 | |

06 Feb

...citizen, or else you have to accept that there will be some military decision process. The reference to Quirin and Haupt in the Hamdi decision was only used to support detention, not execution. However, Haupt could not have been tried in a civilian court because the charge for which he was convicted, "crossing lines without uniform", is part of international military law and can only be charged in a military court. He could, however, have been tried before a Court Martial instead of a Military Commission (as any citizen today...
06.02.10 | |

09 Apr

...a rubber raft, you can kill him. If you see a scout behind your lines, you can shoot at him. Nobody calls these lone encounters a "battle" and nobody remembers them except the individuals involved. A war involves the entire territory of both countries and all international waters. When the US went to war with Afghanistan, international law does not distinguish between Kandahar and Chicago. We may have the military power to send planes and troops to fight in Kandahar, while the enemy may not have the power to send...
09.04.10 | |