Search: crossing lines

...capacity the offender was acting. I’m always suspicious of terms like “most” or “few.” The real question is who (big states or little ones?) believes that. The Kuwaiti proposal was that “any person, whether acting on his own initiative or on behalf of a government, commits an offence...” I don’t see how that doesn’t effect state responsibility. On the one hand, international law is holding more and more people individually accountable for actions done under orders. On the other hand, along the lines of the United States’ reason for not...

In its relentless quest to recover the underseas treasure recently found by a Florida-based company, the Spanish government has instructed its Navy, pursuant to a court order, to detain to U.S. ships belonging to that company. Those ships are currently in Gibraltar, but apparently, they will be boarded and seized as soon as they leave Gibraltar and enter Spanish waters. I’m a little fuzzy on the geography here (maybe the attached map helps?), but assuming that crossing Spanish waters is necessary to leave Gibraltar, the two U.S. ships are out...

...and an intent to destroy a protected group. The Krstić Chamber in the ICTY wrote that Bosnian Serbs sought the “physical disappearance” of Bosnian Muslims in Srebrenica, which was reflective of genocidal intent. Additionally, the Chamber in Karadžić observed that the conduct in Srebrenica was “devised with the intent to permanently remove the Bosnian Muslim population living there,” suggesting that aspirations of ethnic cleansing can simultaneously exist alongside genocidal intent, crossing the threshold of genocide. This led the Krstić Chamber to declare that genocidal intent can be inferred from both...

...suspicion that international law is a pretty weak instrument, especially when dealing with great powers. Nonetheless, states and other international actors use international law all of the time, and they certainly invoke it to try advance their own particular interests. So it’s good to have some idea what international law is, how it works, and what it can and cannot do. One of the challenges for IR students is that not all political science departments offer international law on a regular basis. Crossing campus to take international law at the...

...do not usually claim the right to exclude other nations’ aircraft from their ADIZ, as if it was sovereign territory. (For a recent discussion of the legal issues in ADIZ declarations, see here). Now, since China has usually been careful to avoid crossing into Taiwan’s ADIZ (or at least parts of Taiwan’s ADIZ), its decision to do so now is interesting and significant. But it is not a territorial incursion and it is not (technically) breaching “Taiwan’s airspace”. So news agencies should be careful not to report it as such....

...since the U.S. does not recognize Japanese sovereignty over the Senkaku/Diaoyu Islands, why should it complain when China draws an ADIZ intended to protect airspace over those islands? This wrinkle in the U.S. position also explains Japan’s harsher reaction to the Chinese ADIZ. To Japan, China is literally demanding Japanese airlines report to its military before crossing airspace into or near Japan’s own national airspace. It would be like China demanding information from US airlines flying between San Francisco and Hawaii (Congress would explode with indignation). But from the U.S....

...legal authority for enforcing the boundary line at all? Is there some statute out there that authorizes the Executive Branch to maintain the boundary line where it is and keep folks from crossing it, moving it, or building much larger obstructions than a 3 foot retaining wall? If not, could Medellin have the unintended consequence of wiping out our border with Canada until Congress legislates it? Now, I’d assume that the courts would not go so far, even if that’s the direction Medellin clearly points. For example, I’d expect that,...

...Women, Peace, & Security (WPS) framework and its four pillars, or the positive peace framework and its eight pillars). The term reflects our understanding that, while it is still too early for best practices in this time of uncertainty, fact-finders would benefit from foundational ‘scaffolding’ to help guide their decision making.  This section outlines four of the eight pillars, focusing on the pillars that are built on broadly applicable (digital) evidence principles. Each pillar’s description outlines our methodological approach to its development, where it: 1) identifies the evidentiary principle;  2)...

...(be it GATS, services chapters in FTAs or the plurilateral TISA under negotiation) classify “trade in services” remains very much linked to the idea of physically supplying a service from one country to one other country, with either “the service” crossing the border (mode 1), the consumer physically traveling to the place where the supplier is located (mode 2) or the supplier setting up a physical “commercial presence” (mode 3), or sending a “natural person” (mode 4), to the country of consumption. This focus on the physical is a far...

...we have no idea what it would all add up to. But already last year, we crossed 1.5℃ of warming for the first time. And normally, you need to cross it for a few years before you have definitely passed 1.5℃. So, the situation is dire, and the Secretary-General is emphasizing the urgency of the issue. Moreover, many countries take ‘overshoot’ (crossing the temperature objective and returning to it later in the century) for granted, and many actors want to increase their emissions while compensating for it (net zero). Both...

...patriotism seem to be universal values. I remember trying to cross the street once in Palau, one of the smallest countries in the world, and a high school kid came up to me and said, “This is how we cross the street in PALAU!” Even crossing the street became an act to tell me about his pride in his country. People involved in making foreign policy should be very aware of this. 13) America and Canada share a common culture. This may irk Canadians, but we really do share a...

...that no one has ever been disciplined for this kind ethical line-crossing when it comes to “candid advice-giving.” And, at least as regards the Geneva Conventions question, the client (President Bush, through his counsel, Alberto Gonzales) had access to the alternative view put forth by State. It nonetheless is an important discussion of slippery slope of ends-based advocacy, one which bears discussion with our students. No doubt, there are strong views on where the ethical line is appropriately drawn. To promote open discussion of this issue, ASIL has placed it...