Search: Syria Insta-Symposium

Tomohiro Mikanagi, focuses on the application of Erin’s theory to the acquisition of territory by force while Andrew Clapham tests the book’s central premise in light of so-called “anomalous cases”. On Thursday, the issue of “anomalous cases” is taken up again by Alejandro Chethman, and James A. Green reflects on Erin’s main proposition – the “Type Theory” approach to the meaning of use of force. The symposium closes on Friday, with Erin’s response. Before closing this introduction and inaugurating the symposium, I wated to acknowledge the fact that, despite our...

...and in a classroom facilitates. Many readers of this symposium are conversant with these concerns as controversies about the shift to virtual education proliferate. Unions are rightly alarmed. They grieve the workload implications, the colonisation of personal space, and the surreptitious push for stronger involvement of for-profit actors in the tertiary system. Many also deplore the hasty adoption of new pedagogical technologies as we aim to recreate physical classrooms online rather than think through digital pedagogy. Staff and students are guinea pigs in this neo-managerial bonanza. Throughout our symposium, some...

...with the ideas, problems, and proposals that the symposium brings forth.   In so proceeding, its conveners are deeply cognizant of the positions of privilege that they each occupy—gender for one, class for the other, and whiteness for both. In a dialogue that can, and in some of the pieces included here, does, require a strenuous and wearisome amount of vulnerability on the part of its participants, this symposium seeks to walk the line between making meaningful contributions to the discourse surrounding classism in the international legal profession, and merely creating...

and unprecedented threat to international peace and security”, and called upon Member States to take “all necessary measures … to prevent and suppress terrorist acts committed specifically by ISIL… and to eradicate the safe haven they have established over significant parts of Iraq and Syria.” There is a clear legal basis for military action against ISIL in Syria. The legality of UK strikes against ISIL in Syria is founded on the right of self-defence as it is recognised in Article 51 of the UN Charter. The right to self-defence may...

civilian whose fundamental rights are breached can – if all other elements are met – be a victim of this type of crime.” Indiscriminate and disproportionate attacks against civilians in Syria, as well as unlawful detentions, restrictions on humanitarian aid, appropriation of property and a range of other crimes and violations of fundamental rights, have led to the flight of Syrians, largely civilians, from their homes. Just this week, the Commission of Inquiry on Syria released a report concluding that “forced displacements” occurred “pursuant to ‘evacuation agreements’ negotiated between warring...

on Syria have differed substantially from 1970 and 1973 in their terms. Moreover, from a practical perspective, it is by no means clear that the type of actions taken to protect Libyan civilians would have the same effect in Syria. I don’t know about the practical difference an intervention would make in Syria and Libya. But I notice Koh has elided the (fairly justifiable) complaint by China and Russia that NATO did not exactly stick to “protection of civilians” in its NATO intervention, which suggests they won’t buy that cover...

...ruling marks a victory for victims of international crimes, Syrian victims especially, and a validation of France’s promise to fight impunity (see here, here and here). As a precedent, the decision will have implications for  the currently pending universal jurisdiction proceedings in France (e.g., Syria, Liberia, China, and Ukraine). In this blogpost, we analyse the double criminality saga before French courts. As the decision of the Court has limited itself to an assessment of (Syrian) national legislation, we further demonstrate that the standard of double criminality can be satisfied when...

5. You want to know more? Follow the symposium and read the book! — I am truly honoured and grateful to all experts taking part in this blog symposium. I have read your work when writing the book, engaged with your arguments, and learned from you; you are among the scholars I admire most in your respective disciplines. I look forward to reading your views. I am especially grateful to Katharine & Ezequiel from Armed Groups and International Law, and Jessica from Opinio Juris, for organizing this symposium. Merci beaucoup!...

...civic imaginary of autonomy and dissent. This dynamic strengthens the connection between protest and other forms of legal mobilization, such as human rights claims, court cases or legislative counter-initiatives. The aim of this symposium is to examine the right to protest from a global perspective through case studies that demonstrate the connection and interdependence of protest and legal mobilization, understood as the strategic use of legal procedures and institutions to facilitate social and political change. The symposium also explores both the creative forms of using legal mobilization to advance protest...

of analysis around a given topic area, we are delighted that the symposium is as broad as it is deep. Many of the authors in this symposium question whether international law, or its failure, is complicit in the COVID-19 crisis. Others ask how international law can or should respond to the pandemic. We hope the contributions will help catalyse the conversation beyond the parameters of this symposium. Moreover, we hope that these pieces will form part of a broader constructive response to COVID-19, to alleviate its impact, to prevent similar...

Several months back, Opinio Juris put out a call for papers for our inaugural on-line symposium to junior scholars. The theme was described as follows: As long as people have been writing about public international law, commentators have suggested that it is a system in crisis or somehow under stress. After a moment of optimism at the end of the Cold War, scholarship has returned to the challenges of international law. Opinio Juris is convening an on-line symposium to carefully consider just what these challenges may be: Terrorism? Hegemony? Illegitimacy?...

...Syria, whether to adopt such text just under the political declarations (Part A) or to also include it in the operative clauses (Part B) of the final document, whether to address Syria’s threat of using CW which violates the spirit of the 1925 Geneva Protocol to which Syria is party and whether to address Syria to take certain steps with regard to the fact-finding mission and the security of its CW stockpiles. The latter two issues were deemed to be outside the purview of the OPCW. Negotiations on addressing the...