Search: Symposium on the Functional Approach to the Law of Occupation

practices are justice-apt. [….] Even if law has internal standards of merit—virtues uniquely its own that inhere in its law-like character—these cannot preclude or displace its assessment on independent criteria of justice. A fugue may be at its best when it has all the virtues of fugacity; but law is not best when it excels in legality; law must also be just. A society may therefore suffer not only from too little of the rule of law, but also from too much of it. This does not presuppose that justice...

neutrality, which differs in important ways from the law of land warfare. In any case, contemporary law, terminology aside, says that insurgency is a domestic law issue, on which international takes no position, one way of the other. It can and is criminalized by domestic law, and insurgents have no protection as such in international law (leaving aside specially contested questions such as AP1, art. 4) against prosecution by the domestic sovereign. Recognition of a belligerency by other sovereigns has no impact on the domestic law status of insurgents in...

...of the land prior to its occupation ie some hybrid between 1967 Jordanian law and the law of the 1947 British mandate. Which ever law it is, there is clearly no express law that says Jews, or even any foreigner is not permitted to live anywhere in that state or extend a garden. So it now comes down to the details of planning law from an ancient and antiquated legal system. So lets say the garden extension did breach planning law Israel has failed to implement the law. Israel's breach...

Where ruling of law reigns, there is no supremacy to no one, no official, no authority, but: Principals !! and above all, the principle of rule of law, means: No one is above the law !! So, the fact, that there is no constitution, to the Israeli state, never ever bared any fulfillment of that principle of rule of law. So , even the Knesset , is under such guidance , endless times , the supreme court , ordered and directed the Knesset , it is even prescribed by law...

international law in the U.S. legal system, including the domestic status of treaties and customary international law, the validity of executive agreements, delegations of authority to international institutions, Alien Tort Statute litigation, sovereign and official immunity, criminal law enforcement, and the U.S. conduct of war. At one time or another, I have written law review articles relating to most of these topics. As the contributors to the symposium observed, however, the book is not an effort to re-argue positions that I have advanced in scholarship over the years. Instead, I...

Peremptory Norms of the International Community”, in European Journal of International Law, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp. 837-861). It seems clear that, in spite of their importance to assess the legitimacy of international law, there is no single and widespread definition of what these values are (on international “common goods”, see Cafaggio, F. and D. D. Caron, “Global Public Goods amidst a Plurality of Legal Orders: A Symposium”, in European Journal of International Law, Volume 23, Issue 3, 2012, pp. 643-649, as well as Shaffer, G. “International Law and Global...

[Robert McCorquodale is the Director of the British Institute of International and Comparative Law, Professor of International Law and Human Rights, University of Nottingham, and Barrister, Brick Court Chambers, London. This is the introductory post in the Defining the Rule of Law Symposium, based on this article (free access for six months).] References to the ‘rule of law’ in international law books, articles and blogs are everywhere. Yet very few of these authors set out what they mean by an international rule of law. Most of those who engage with...

history of international law is not law – they are the extinct Neanderthals of international law’s evolutionary process. And we will only know if they become law on hindsight, looking back to see where the one true law ended up travelling through time. This makes the process of understanding past law basically one of mere discovery. We already have the answer. We are only looking to see how we got to where we are now. But past law is not simply an incomplete version of current law. Past legal scholars...

the majority Trial Judgment. The word occupation was generally, if not consistently, put in quotation marks as ‘occupation’ and the charges addressed possible crimes that took place during this ‘occupation’, rather than breaches of the legal regime of occupation.  Judge Mindua, however, upsets this orthodox account of occupation, arguing that non-state parties’ occupations are covered by the international laws of occupation. He does this by, again, introducing jus ad bellum or just war considerations. He argues that the established right to self-determination must entail a right to occupy; self-determination, he...

of political co-ordination among agencies which has to be followed by “real law” either at the level of the nation state or at the level of international organizations whereas “global law” – which lacks a clear attribution to the state and state-based “international organizations” – would not be regarded as law in the stricter sense. The concept of “global administrative law” should not be conceived as a supplement to “global constitutionalism” – it is different! It is conceived as a law that is generated “bottom-up” by a network of overlapping...

earlier symposium essay on the topic or Roger’s lengthier treatment of it here). How can Justice Scalia so strenuously object to Constitutional law interpretations that invoke foreign or international legal norms, but at the same time insist that courts do not pay enough attention to those very same sources when it comes to interpreting the scope of U.S. statutes? Perhaps the answer lies in the doctrine. After all, the Constitution and statutes constitute two different sources of law. The Constitution serves as a “formal” source of law (i.e., a law...

in such a case for the enactment of federal law. [My emphasis] The Federal Parliament must therefore consent to the conclusion of a treaty by means of an act of parliament. That act authorizes the President to signify Germany’s consent to be bound internationally, and introduces the treaty, at the rank of a federal statute, into domestic law. Indeed, the modern view is that this act does nothing more than give the order in domestic law that the treaty shall be applied as it exists in international law, even as...