Search: Symposium on the Functional Approach to the Law of Occupation

[Michael W. Lewis is a Professor of Law at Ohio Northern University where he teaches International Law and the Law of War.] I want to thank Gabor for continuing a discussion started over on Lawfare a couple of weeks ago and to thank Opinio Juris for allowing me an opportunity to respond. As I had the last word on Lawfare I believe Gabor will be given the final word here. Gabor is correct that drones themselves are “stupid” in that they do not make any targeting decisions themselves. Should that...

...Human Rights First’s position. We do not claim that the law of IAC is applicable to NIAC by analogy. We claim that the procedural protections of the law of NIAC, namely those of Common Article 3, which is explicitly applicable to NIAC, can only be understood with reference to national law that must comply with applicable human rights law. Second, what Mike suggests here is precisely what I refer to above: the mistaken analogy between detention and targeting. Now let’s return to drones. You are a political leader. Are you...

...attack would be dramatic. Even so, the risk of inaction is sufficiently high that we should be prepared to handle the political fallout from a U.S. attack on Iran to avoid the security risks associated with an Iranian nuclear weapon. Some of my international law colleagues may contend that a preemptive attack on Iran’s uranium enrichment facility would be a violation of international law. That is true. I will not attempt to justify such an attack by using the rubric of self-defense, because any such justification stretches the concept of...

...Bolton's political agenda -- the same situation that occurred in Iraq, where the Bush Administration pressured the CIA and other intelligence agencies to tell it only what it wanted to hear about WMDs. Aaron Ostrovsky One thing that I couldn't help thinking as I read the Brooks piece this morning is that he seems to confuse U.S. internal and external relations. A functional "law of nations" is not going to take anything away from our constitutional rights as citizens of the United States. In fact, if anything it will protect...

second chapter tries to clear up some of the conceptual confusion in existing case law. It examines the notion of state jurisdiction in human rights treaties, and attempts to place it within the framework of international law. Is this notion the general concept of jurisdiction one finds in public international law, which sets out limits on the prescription and enforcement of domestic law, as contemplated by the European Court in Bankovic, or is it a distinct, autonomous concept, which is a part of a self-contained human rights regime? Is it...

Kate Cronin-Furman Hi KJH, Taylor et al. were acting in their official capacity, so all we need to support the claim that they have immunity is evidence that act/functional immunity for international organizations exists as a matter of customary law. I would argue that it does - it seems to me that there's consensus that when you allow an international organization's employees onto your territory, an obligation exists to respect their immunities so far as is necessary for them to do their job. Thus, even though Libya's not a signatory...

...difference to your analysis? Aurel Sari Ian, I cannot comment on the SOFA's standing in Russian or Ukrainian law, but from an international law perspective it sure is a full-blown treaty. In fact, it does not differ much from agreements adopted for similar contexts (ie stationing type SOFAs). Jordan Aurel: I agree with Harold Koh and others, and the U.S. position, that there is no gravity threshold regarding armed force that violates Article 2(4) or triggers Article 51. See footnote in the article at SSRN in the first response above....

In addition to my posts here (see below), I have several pieces over the last week discussing different aspects of the South China Sea award up at various outlets across the web universe (I know, I know, I need to stop writing about this topic, but indulge me just a little longer). To briefly recap my various takes, here is a quick summary: As a legal matter, China lost every substantive issue before the South China Sea arbitral tribunal. I argued here at Lawfare that the award “dramatically widens” the...

...to protect civilians and civilian polulated areas under threat of attack ... while excluding a foreign occupation force in any form" on Libyan territory. Is a "defense of civilians" force or a "self-determination assistance" force on the ground with the consent of the new govt. in Benghazi (assume such exists and is there) a "foreign occupation" force? Seems not. Non Liquet This is exactly the question Peggy. Who doesn't think the Western powers have the ability to smash up the existing Libyan government? But then . . . what do...

serve as proof of genocidal intent where it is also accompanied by the elimination of its military personnel, which—much like the destruction of law enforcement—leaves the group “defenceless.” This may seem like a particularly controversial view since the military personnel of a belligerent force is generally considered targetable during armed conflict, pursuant to the laws of war. It is important to recall, however, that the laws of war and the prohibition on genocide are not one and the same. It is, in fact, possible for military personnel to be lawfully...

...However strongly you may feel about abortion, legitimizing Nazi analogies does not help you make your case. Does the public pay any attention to protesters who shout that those who want to outlaw abortion are interested in Nazi-like control of womens' bodies? Eric Van De Hey Well, since it appears that we have a lull in the fighting over Karadzic (and yes, i am still looking through details of Malta, Tokyo, Nuremberg, etc. al for the point, and I will respond once I am through), this looks like a good...

is calling for an investigation of Israel's bombing of the facility as a possible violation of international law. And it violates international law to attack a facility that UNRWA itself says was in control of the "militants" you are fighting exactly how? David Bernstein Two updates: The Ha'aretz story suggests that UNRWA said that this school had been taken over by militants. In previous news stories, Guness had said that the video footage from 2007 was from a different school. I don't know if the Ha'aretz story is mangled, or...