Search: Symposium on the Functional Approach to the Law of Occupation

...harder, jurisdictional issue for later negotiation. The report expresses concern that an “all or nothing” approach by the United States on aggression might derail U.S. efforts to reengage with ICC overall. It goes on to make additional suggestions for building U.S. cooperation with the ICC, via direct engagement with the ICC prosecutor, legislative buy-in through Congressional representation on the U.S. delegation in Kampala, and better U.S. law enforcement accountability on international criminal law issues consistent with notions of complimentarity. Readers wanting to read the whole report can find it here....

...paucity of judicial opinions in several areas poses both opportunities and risks that policy makers should appreciate—courts can intervene to shape the application of law, particularly in areas involving Constitutional rights. Policy decisions will necessarily be shaped and bounded by the legal framework in which they are made, and policy consideration may help identify gaps and challenges in current laws and inform necessary developments in the law. That process may prompt proposals for a new legislative framework to rationalize the patchwork of overlapping laws that apply to information, telecommunications, networks,...

humblelawstudent When did opinio juris become a flack for Obama? Kevin Jon Heller It's not about Obama, but about a pliant media that is committed to maintaining its preferred framing of the election -- Obama elite, McCain (worth $100,000,000) regular guy, straight talker -- at all costs. humblelawstudent When the media's preferred framing touches on a far more pertinent topic, such as McCain's "100 hundred year" remark on Iraq, I'm sure you provided a similiar "pesky context." Oh wait, you didn't and wouldn't--not that I expect you to. The real...

...of the law of war. It is based on a simple premise: if you conduct yourself as a “lawful” combatant – which requires you to respect the law of armed conflict and facilitate the ability of your enemy to distinguish you from the civilian population – you get the reward of immunity for your warlike acts upon capture. If, however, you violate the law of armed conflict and are subsequently captured, your misconduct falls outside the “blanket of combatant immunity”, and you are subject to criminal sanction. Compliance with the...

ministers from the jurisdiction of foreign domestic courts (Skander Galand, p. 192). With the development of the International Criminal Law framework, the creation of the International Criminal Court (ICC), and the wide recognition of exceptions to functional immunity of foreign State officials accused of core international crimes like war crimes and crimes against humanity, the international community has already demonstrated the need to reform the rules of immunity in the shared interest to promote accountability. However, as absolute personal immunity still holds strong, for the sake of international justice, an...

[Professor Diane Ring is Professor of Law at Boston College Law School] The international tax problems of today are typically beyond the scope of a single nation to solve. However, the prospect of multinational problem solving, often under the auspices of an international organization, unleashes objections grounded in sovereignty. Despite widespread reliance on sovereignty arguments, little attention has been directed at what is meant by sovereignty and what place it has in international tax policy. This article contends that a loss of tax sovereignty undermines both significant functional roles played...

ATS, we take a functional approach and consider whether the Court’s interpretation of the ATS, which relies heavily on the federal courts, is the best way to achieve the purpose behind the ATS. We conclude that, from a functional perspective, the Executive Branch is best positioned to determine how and whether to adopt rules of customary international law on behalf of the U.S. We propose that treating customary international law as state common law, subject to federal preemption by the President, is the best way to maintain a judicial role...

framework for the prosecution of international crimes (BT Drs. 20/9471, 20/10015, 20/10131 No. 1.21, as amended by the Legal Affairs Committee, 20/11661). The declared aims of the legislative amendments are to “close gaps in criminal liability, strengthen victims’ rights and improve the broad impact of international criminal law judgments”. Accordingly, the reform of covers a broad scope – important changes provided for by the law concern both substantive and procedural aspects in the German Code of Crimes against International Law [CCAIL], the German Criminal Code [CC], the German Code of...

that included all the parties. (Self-promotion alert: I analyze these and other like cases of fictional and coerced consent in my book Humanitarian Occupation). So far international law has not taken this elaborate fictional façade as a sign that failed states should be treated, in some or all respects, as legally different from functional states. Political scientists observing the same phenomena have not been so reticent. Robert Jackson famously refers to failed states as “quasi-states” and distinguishes been the empirical and juridical function of states, the former being missing in...

still have functional immunity from third-party jurisdiction. But recent developments are witnessing a sea of change in this area of law. The International Law Commission has pointed to an emerging exception to immunity for certain international crimes, namely genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes (Annex III Article 7 of the Draft Articles on Immunity).  In these situations, Netanyahu’s claim for functional immunity for such crimes from domestic courts might not be recognized, though he would have to travel to one of these countries to face arrest, since most States...

...delineate the borders that divided them. Laws and borders have a similar relationship. Sometimes laws are the product of borders as when national boundaries delineate the reach of States’ authorities. But borders may also be the product of law; laws regularly draw lines between permitted and prohibited conduct or bound off required acts from permissible ones. Both logics are on display in debates over international law in cyberspace. Some characterize cyberspace as a unique, self-governing ‘space’ that requires its own borders and the drawing of tailor-made rules therein. For others,...

...the Constitution authorizes our Government to enforce our laws abroad, then when the Government agents exercise this authority, the Constitution travels with them. Under this definition, the Constitution is an unavoidable correlative of the Government’s power to enforce the law. I don’t think it is clear which of these possible definitions future courts will adopt. It really is anyone’s guess. The Court in Boumediene seemed to emphasize a functional, ad hoc approach that would prevent the political branches from exercising power and then manipulating the circumstances under which that power...