is addressed by other provisions of the Statute, and they address it better than Article 17 could. I would like to contribute four points to this discussion. First, Article 17 does not exhaust the principle of
complementarity. Article 17 is an important but technical admissibility rule, which renders cases inadmissible before the ICC if they are genuinely addressed by states. Article 17 is certainly a centerpiece of
complementarity, and it is understandable that it is often the focus of
complementarity discussion. However, insofar as ‘
complementarity’ refers to the broader interplay...