Search: Complementarity SAIF GADDAFI

...within its armed forces. Second, under the “complementarity” regime in Article 17 of the Rome Statute, the ICC is a court of last resort. Consequently, any country can avoid ICC proceedings by conducting its own investigations and – if warranted – prosecutions. Rather than trying to obstruct the work of the ICC, the U.S. should commit to thoroughly investigating and, where justified, prosecuting cases related to torture, thereby precluding such cases from appearing on the ICC’s docket. Third, U.S. efforts to obstruct the work of the ICC have backfired in...

...some delegations to the Rome Conference as an initial “act of sovereignty, namely, acceptance of the statute.” It triumphed over the alternative proposals seeking to make the ICC’s jurisdiction conditional upon the express consent of both the territorial State and State of nationality. Essentially, therefore, the Rome Statute ascribes an intention to States Parties to accept in advance the possibility that jurisdiction will be exercised by the ICC over their nationals, subject, of course, to other limitations such as the principle of complementarity. It has been suggested that a state’s...

...a repudiation of multilateral engagement and a repudiation of the rule of law. Specifically, Secretary Pompeo’s statements were not accompanied by any commitment to investigate and/or prosecute the crimes alleged to have been committed by U.S. nationals (members of the U.S. armed forced and members of the CIA) in Afghanistan—even though some of the crimes have been well-documented by the United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. Notably, the U.S.-ICC showdown could be avoided if the United States prosecuted these cases itself. Under the ICC’s complementarity regime, any state that...

...Statute to deny the Prosecutor proprio motu power full stop — regardless of why Ukraine might not refer a particular suspect to the tribunal. I also believe that giving a state complete primacy over an ICT is unprecedented (for a reason) in the history of international criminal law. Not even the ICC is so subordinated, despite the principle of complementarity, because the Court’s own judges have the final say over whether a case is admissible. Conclusion For too long — more than three years — too many states and scholars...

...the UN Office of Legal Affairs recently added the following audio lectures to the AVL’s podcast: Professor Concepción Escobar Hernández on “El Tribunal Internacional del Derecho del Mar” (in Spanish) and Professor Sarah Nouwen on “Complementarity” (in English). The Audiovisual Library of International Law is available as a podcast on SoundCloud and can also be accessed through the preinstalled applications in Apple or Google devices, or through the podcast application of your preference by searching “Audiovisual Library of International Law”. If you would like to post an announcement on Opinio...

The Harvard International Law Journal is pleased to announce its third online symposium with Opinio Juris. The symposium will begin tomorrow, Monday, January 23 and will run until Thursday, January 26. It features the following line-up: On Monday, Mark Tushnet will respond to David Landau‘s article, The Reality of Social Rights Enforcement. On Tuesday, Darryl Robinson and Carsten Stahn will respond to Kevin Jon Heller’s article, A Sentence-Based Theory of Complementarity. On Wednesday, Carlos Vazquez will respond to David L. Sloss‘ article, Executing Foster v. Neilson: The Two-Step Approach to...

...Statute. These include duties vis-à-vis States Parties which, if it had not withdrawn, would have otherwise arisen for the State in question on account of the Court’s exercise of its complementary jurisdiction in respect of the crimes over which that State would normally exercise jurisdiction. The ‘legal situation’ in connection with the Court’s exercise of jurisdiction encompasses, among others, the State Party’s duties to submit oneself to the ICC’s scrutiny as part of the complementarity analysis and to its admissibility determinations, as well as the duty to accept any prospective...

...numbers.” Sara Mardini after talking to an immigration officer Complementarity of refugee law with international human rights law is compulsory in the case of the life project, at least under the present legal system. Let us recall that one of James Hathaway’s strongest arguments is that the 1951 Refugee Convention, a child of its days and still the primary source of refugee-specific rights in international law, has an underlying structure for the entitlement of those rights that is hierarchical and discriminatory due to a distinction between citizens and non-citizens, physically...

...African states as victims of a rigged international system. As an IR scholar, I appreciate that the book departs from the premise that international justice is ‘inherently and inextricably political’. By taking power seriously, Ba makes a significant contribution to our understanding of the motivations of states in their interactions with the ICC. He advances the well-rehearsed theoretical arguments on topics including complementarity, heads-of-state immunity and state compliance with international law by using empirical evidence from a plethora of case studies to test how the theory works in practice. Reading...

...contributions based on an abstract (max 500 words) that should be sent by 20 December 2023. Abstracts should be submitted with a short bio to lisa.heschl@uni-graz.at. The deadline for submitting the manuscript is end of March 2024. For further information or questions, please email lisa.heschl@uni-graz.at. The ICC as a Justice Hub, Pragmatic Complementarity and Domestic ICL Enforcement: Tilburg Law School, Department of Criminal Law, organizes an international conference on domestic prosecution of international crimes in light of the ICC’s shift from “Apex court to Justice Hub”.The conference will be held...

...that need to be adjudicated internationally at the ICC (or elsewhere). Indeed, one of the most interesting developments in international criminal law has been the elaboration of a fairly clear framework for the elaboration of a set of jurisdictional principles – complementarity, gravity, the widespread or systematic nature of the harm, the victim or the harm caused some specific damage to an international interest (i.e., attacks on UN peacekeepers), the shocking nature of the harm, etc. – to sift cases properly before international criminal courts from those properly tried elsewhere....

...make the law, including the capacity to delegate its jurisdiction to the ICC. (OTP Request, para. 185) Consequently, the Prosecutor herself concluded that the Oslo Accord are “not a question that affects the Court’s jurisdiction.” Yet, she acknowledged that this might become “an issue of cooperation or complementarity.” (Ibid., para. 186) Accordingly, although the Oslo Accords – as ‘special agreement’ – might affect the enforcement jurisdiction of the occupied State (Palestine). Nevertheless, it cannot alter its prescriptive jurisdiction. i.e. the ability to delegate the exercises of its criminal jurisdiction to...