Search: Complementarity SAIF GADDAFI

...prosecute and try crimes against humanity under the principle of complementarity (article 17 of the Rome Statute). The future convention follows a similar logic. While it does not create an international court, it will oblige states parties to prevent, prosecute and provide reparation for crimes against humanity. The future convention and the Rome Statute are therefore complementary and mutually reinforcing. Equipping Justice Actors to Protect the Rights of Parties in Trials The Guinean justice system distinguished itself by conducting the trial of the 2009 massacre from start to finish, effectively...

...Statute to deny the Prosecutor proprio motu power full stop — regardless of why Ukraine might not refer a particular suspect to the tribunal. I also believe that giving a state complete primacy over an ICT is unprecedented (for a reason) in the history of international criminal law. Not even the ICC is so subordinated, despite the principle of complementarity, because the Court’s own judges have the final say over whether a case is admissible. Conclusion For too long — more than three years — too many states and scholars...

...competing jurisdictions will coordinate their prosecutions remains to be seen. Whether the international criminal tribunals will take cognizance of third country prosecutions as part of their determination of whether to prosecute is uncertain. And whether these third country national courts will adopt the ICC’s approach of complementarity and deference to the primary national court prosecution is even more uncertain. Certainly the Spanish judge that issued an arrest warrant against three American soldiers exonerated by the United States military justice system suggests that in at least some circumstances they will not....

...them unable to enter into business transactions, move currency between banks, travel freely, or purchase basic goods and services. Despite the global focus on targeting human rights violators, in 2020 the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”), based on an Executive Order of former U.S. President Trump, imposed sanctions on personnel from the International Criminal Court. Madame Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda became a specially designated national, or “SDN,” along with Phakiso Mocochoko, head of the Jurisdiction, Complementarity and Cooperation Division at the ICC. These economic sanctions were in...

...less able to divest the ICC of jurisdiction over Bashir and the others pursuant to the principle of complementarity: Last year the Sudanese government appointed a special prosecutor Nimr Ibrahim Mohamed to look in the Darfur abuses committed since 2003 and promised to bring Ali Kushayb, an alleged Janjaweed militia leader wanted by the ICC, before court. However, to date Kushayb has not been prosecuted and an attempt by the special prosecutor to probe the governor of South Kordofan Ahmed Haroun, also wanted by the ICC, was blocked by the...

I am currently in Durban, South Africa, co-teaching a fantastic ICL course with my friend (and War and Law blogger) Chris Gevers at the University of KwaZulu-Natal. Durban is a very nice city, with amazing coffee — high praise from someone who lives in Melbourne. I will be spending three days in Cape Town next week, then two days in Johannesburg. On June 13, I’ll be giving a lunchtime lecture at the Open Society Initiative for Southern Africa on Libya’s failed complementarity challenge; any Opinio Juris readers in Johannesburg/Pretoria are...

...Institute in which she inspired students that they, too, could pursue their passion. Her 2017 lecture, to a packed hall, addressed comparative criminal procedure in mass atrocity trials. Megan was a prolific scholar, having authored scores of law review articles and book chapters. Her main research area was international criminal procedure, particularly questions arising during proceedings before the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and the International Criminal Court (“ICC”). See full CV here. Megan’s scholarship touched many themes – complementarity, procedure, and judging. One thread that pervaded her...

...are not ICC members, and its unlikely the international community would seriously sanction Hamas for failure to cooperate. (It also reflects a poor comprehension of complementarity, which would leave the Palestinians much more open to charges given that they have never investigated, let alone prosecuted, their own war crimes). The Palestinians openly seek to use ICC investigations for diplomatic leverage: “Diplomats say they expect the Palestinian plan to join the ICC and set a war crimes investigation in motion to be one of the bargaining chips on the table in...

...the Court in such a situation. On the contrary, they would almost certainly rely on the principle of complementarity (Article 17 of the Rome Statute) and prosecute the perpetrators themselves, divesting the Court of jurisdiction. And that would be a very good thing: as Moreno-Ocampo pointed out when he was sworn in as the ICC’s prosecutor, “the absence of trials before this Court, as a consequence of the regular functioning of national institutions, would be a major success.” And therein lies the fundamental problem with Scott’s comment. The great powers...

...functioning of the Court do not rest on a delegation of powers by national states but on the fulfilment of a jus puniendi function at the international level. Importantly, within the ICC system informed by the principle of complementarity, such function shall not be read as securing a ‘primary right’ to punish to states, but as making clear that it is their ‘primary responsibility’ to make ‘sovereignty answerable’ (Stahn, p.447). This is fully in line with public law conceptions of the modern state where sovereignty understood as a ‘system of...

...never implemented. Moreover, inclusion of actors from these Oblasts ought to extend to actors that favour unity and represent minorities, including Russian-speaking groups opposed to Russia’s role in the conflict or to regional autonomy.  Subnational governance arrangements in Ukraine ought to centre around strong decentralization at the municipal level—in complementarity to a ‘weaker’ asymmetrical arrangement at the regional level—to avoid further deepening divisions along regional lines, which would render any future unity-building more challenging and instead encourage other regions to demand similar levels of self-governance. Moreover, this approach would increase...

...reasons. As already noted, it demonstrates a model for enforcing international obligations on non-state legal persons. As such, the principles that it has developed are highly relevant to AGI enforcement. The ICC’s fundamental principle of complementarity, for example, could be readily embedded in AGI regulation enforcement, thereby avoiding the need to construct a jurisdiction regime from scratch. Likewise, AI scholars ought to review the sophisticated (and relatively demanding) cooperation arrangements outlined in Part 9 of the Rome Statute. Contraventions of an AI moratorium are likely to involve complex cross-border elements,...