Search: Complementarity SAIF GADDAFI

...(South Africa’s vote is particularly interesting, given that it has supported deferring the ICC’s investigation in Kenya, much to the consternation of Max du Plessis and Christopher Gevers). More importantly, though, the referral seems a wholly appropriate response to the unconscionable violence perpetrated by Gaddafi and his henchmen against Libya’s civilian population. (In case anyone’s wondering, bombing civilians is indeed a crime against humanity.) I’d like nothing more than to see Gaddafi end up in the dock at the ICC. UPDATE: The full text of the resolution is available here....

...to the referral. This account provides context for the self-referral and lays bare the political and security motives for the referrals. The four themes of the book, namely: the strategic use of self-referrals to the ICC; complementarity between national and international justice systems; the limits of state cooperation; and the use of international courts in domestic political conflicts, are not only educational and informative beyond the ordinary reading of subjects such as complementarity and the role of domestic courts, but are also thoroughly canvassed by Prof. Ba. Further, the selection...

[Alexander K.A. Greenawalt is an Associate Professor at Pace University School of Law] Let me start by thanking Opinio Juris and the Virginia Journal of International Law for hosting this online symposium. I am also honored that Mark Drumbl has graciously agreed to be my respondent. In 2005, the International Criminal Court issued warrants for the arrest of Joseph Kony, the leader of Uganda’s murderous Lord’s Resistance Army, as well as four other high-level LRA suspects (two of whom reportedly have since died) to answer charges of crimes...

This on-the-ground report from Sudan provides a brief but interesting glimpse at Sudan’s effort to avoid transferring defendants to the International Criminal Court. Sudan has created special tribunals to try individuals of suspected war crimes. If its domestic processes are deemed sufficient by the ICC, then the ICC cannot exercise jurisdiction over alleged war crimes in Sudan. This has always been one of the fundamental principles of the ICC, but the very fuzziness of the concept has also been the source of criticism from ICC opponents. Here is...

...working prosecutorial theories, this is one way to ensure that civil society groups focus their limited resources on the most valuable activities. Recommendation 7: The OTP should publish periodic updates on its complementarity assessment and invite the input of civil society with knowledge of the national legal system and domestic proceedings. Rationale: Many groups highlighted the perceived inconsistencies in how the OTP carries out its activities during the complementarity assessment. For example, the number and regularity of trips taken to  countries or the analysis of matters related to complementarity appear...

...the ICC has jurisdiction over three types of crimes – war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. It could be argued that with regard to most crime allegations Israel will have the option of raising the complementarity argument in accordance with article (article 17(1)(a) of the Rome Statute). Israel will most likely base her complementarity argument on the outcomes of the 2nd Turkel Report and the ongoing investigation process. However, even if the Israeli complementarity claim stands, there’s still one issue which complementarity won’t resolve, and that’s the settlements. Where’s...

voyage of discovery. Sasha is skeptical of the value of ex ante guidelines to clarify how complementarity might inform the admissibility of cases. He argues that guidelines are not useful. He needs to make a stronger case here. I have argued elsewhere, in a point that Sasha discusses, that a light touch to complementarity (as articulated through a qualified deference standard), would better serve overall justice interests. In any event, developing guidelines, even simply to frame a conversation, would promote transparency, dialogue, and some predictability. Each of these elements is...

...raised by African States at Rome in 1998, and the manner in which those concerns have come to be realized. Concern 3: The Trojan ‘workhorse’ of complementarity The fear of an overzealous, sovereignty-usurping international court underpinned Africa states’ insistence in 1998 that the ICC ‘should be an effective complement to national criminal justice systems’, and as a result there were significant safeguards included in the Rome Statute to mitigate this concern, including the ICC’sorganizing principle of ‘complementarity’. Therefore, perhaps most concerning for African states is McAuliffe’s suggestion that, through the...

...Parties, the President of the Court, the Prosecutor and the Registrar will need to collaborate and coordinate their efforts to engage the AU successfully. This collaboration is crucial to ensuring the successful signing of a MoU. Improve Transparency: Enhance transparency and accountability by providing more information on its decision-making processes, procedures, and outcomes. Publishing detailed reports, provide regular updates on ongoing cases, and engage in more public outreach efforts to promote awareness of its mandate and activities.  Promote Complementarity: Strengthen commitment to the principle of complementarity by offering technical and...

The Institute for War & Peace Reporting has an interesting report today on the Ugandan government’s efforts to prosecute Kony and other LRA members in a special domestic court. According to the IWPR’s report, the problem is not the lack of political will, but the potential retroactivity of the legislation necessary to make the Rome Statute’s core crimes — war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide — punishable under domestic Ugandan law: ICC judges will examine the cases against the rebel Lord’s Resistance Army, LRA, suspects to determine...

...to consider issues of complementarity in order to authorize a proprio motu investigation in the first place, because it has to find the OTP’s contemplated cases admissible in order to conclude that there is a “reasonable basis to proceed with [the[ investigation.” Dov’s position thus requires the PTC to consider complementarity twice in Burundi-like situations: once when the OTP asks it to authorize a proprio motu investigation ex parte (under Art. 15), and again when the affected state asks it to defer the investigation (under Art. 18). When deciding to...

On 11 June 2013, Judge Sanji Mmasenono Monageng asked the Presidency to excuse her from the Appeals Chamber concerning the recent denial of Libya’s admissibility challenge to the case against Saif Gaddafi, which Libya is appealing. Judge Monageng’s request was based on her previous participation (as Presiding Judge) in the Pre-Trial Chamber’s decision to issue an Arrest Warrant for Saif — the same Arrest Warrant that played a critical role in the (differently constituted) Pre-Trial Chamber’s later conclusion that Libya is not currently investigating the same case as the ICC....