Search: Complementarity SAIF GADDAFI

...of alleged crimes in Bangladesh/Myanmar situation, it should assess the investigative or prosecuting attempts of Bangladesh in addition to those of Myanmar within the assessment of complementarity under the Rome Statute. Against the backdrop, the blog post will first highlight that the ICC omitted to take note of the prosecuting or investigative attempts in Bangladesh while assessing the issue of complementarity. Then, it will argue that existing judicial forums of Bangladesh have jurisdiction to investigate or prosecute “same persons and substantially the same conduct” that the ICC is also investigating....

...the ICC Prosecutor had to act quickly – it is very likely she already had evidence against Yekatom, but his transfer to the ICC appears to have been triggered by his unrelated arrest in CAR. Complementarity and the Special Criminal Court The timing, circumstances and wider context of Yekatom’s arrest inevitably raise questions about complementarity. Why is the ICC – instead of focusing on national jurisdictions that are ‘unable or unwilling’ to prosecute – wasting precious time and resources, yet again, on cases that could be prosecuted domestically (think Lubanga,...

conclusion that it certainly is not "ultra vires", as you put it in an earlier comment. Milan Dov, To follow your argument to its logical conclusion, the Security Council could refer the situation in Libya except for any and all crimes committed by individuals other than Gaddafi personally and this would constitute a referral of a "situation" and would vest the Court with jurisdiction over Gaddafi. I think there is certainly a colorable argument that this cannot be. The challenge is based on the express language of Article 13(b). The...

...a rule exclusion view of lex specialis doctrine when it adds a human rights caveat (arrest if possible) to an IHL rule (“combatants” may be targeted). But I’m not sure what this adds to (or detracts from) our general discussion about complementarity between IHL and IHRL. But there is nothing about adding an extra layer of protection against targeting as a matter of domestic law or policy that undermines the theory of IHL/IHRL complementarity. When the US accorded PoW status to detainees who did not meet the criteria outlined for...

As I recently noted, the Appeals Chamber has rejected Libya’s request to suspend its obligation to surrender Saif Gaddafi to the ICC pending resolution of its admissibility appeal. Libya, of course, has no intention of complying with that obligation. Indeed, it admitted as much today: According to Libya’s Justice Minister Salah al-Marghani, Seif, who is being detained in the Libyan city of Zintan by order of the General attorney, will soon be transferred to Tripoli to stand trial. But the ICC wants to try him, and Gaddafi’s brother-in-law and former...

...months in detention without access to a lawyer — and that the PTC’s decision means that, if its dilatory approach to the Saif admissibility challenge is any indication, he will spend another ten months or so in the same situation. Even worse, the PTC seriously misrepresented the defence’s argument concerning the length of time Libya waited to file its admissibility challenge. The PTC says, as the bolded text in para. 30 indicates, that the defence claimed Libya waited seven months. But that is not what the defence argued. Here is...

The Office of the Prosecutor has filed its response to Libya’s challenge to the admissibility of the cases against Saif Gaddafi and Abdullah al-Senussi. There are a number of interesting aspects to the response. First, it says nothing about the case of al-Senussi. That’s a curious omission, given that the response specifically points out with regard to Saif (para. 41) that he remains in the custody of the Zintan rebels, making it possible that Libya is “unable” to prosecute him. If there is an open question about Libya’s ability to...

Let’s assume that the Libyan rebels do prevail and that they end up capturing Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi. Does the new Libyan government have a legal obligation to turn him over to the ICC, even if they seek to try him in Libyan courts? Libya is not a member of the ICC Rome Statute, so its only obligation flows from the U.N. Security Council’s Resolution (UNSC 1970) referring Libya’s case to the ICC. The relevant paragraph makes clear that Libya must cooperate with the ICC prosecutor. 5. Decides that the...

have gone through had the UN not intervened. It may be "extra" wrong for China, Algeria and SA to have considered arming Gaddafi more recently but it was always wrong to get so cozy with Gaddafi that states provided him with arms and apparently help with rendition and torture. M. Gross I doubt the sticker price was what they cared about. More likely, they planned to parley their clutch help of Gaddafi into resource extraction contracts once he was victorious and the various NATO-aligned companies such as ENI were expelled....

...Phil Clark’s book. Proactive complementarity means that international (regional) courts would directly interact with national courts to encourage them to prosecute international crimes and strengthen their capacity to do so if needed. Proactive complementarity can help circumvent or mitigate the effects of international criminal prosecutions’ shortcomings and challenges. For instance, I have made the case for extending the jurisdiction of the East African Court of Justice over international crimes elsewhere and explained various ways in which the court would deploy proactive complementarity features to the benefit of national justice systems...

[Carsten Stahn responds to Kevin Jon Heller, A Sentence-Based Theory of Complementarity. This post is part of the Third Harvard International Law Journal/Opinio Juris Symposium. Carsten Stahn is Professor of International Criminal Law and Global Justice at Leiden University and Programme Director of the Grotius Centre for International Legal Studies. He is inter alia editor of ‘The International Criminal Court and Complementarity: From Theory to Practice’, Cambridge University Press, 2011. ] One Step Forward, Two Steps Back? – Second thoughts on a ‘sentence-based’ theory of complementarity I am delighted to...

...to the admissibility of a specific case. When a defendant challenges admissibility on complementarity grounds, it does indeed make sense to hold the OTP to a “high threshold” for finding unwillingness — a low threshold would make it too easy for the OTP to retain control over the case, thereby undermining the entire point of complementarity. But no such concern is present when the OTP is unilaterally considering whether a state is generally willing to investigate criminal allegations. Indeed, at the situational level, there are many reasons why a low...