Further, the threshold of “widespread, long-
term and severe effects” adds an ambiguous proportionality standard coupled with a very high threshold to hold an attack as impermissible. First, these
terms are not defined appropriately making the provisions susceptible to be misused by powerful states. The attacking state can justify almost any environmental harm as long as it does not have a “widespread, long-
term or severe” effect. This framework fails to account for the incremental and cumulative environmental damage caused by conflict, which, though not immediately catastrophic, can lead to long-
term ecological...