Search: {search_term_string}

...a hardliner retired General accused of human rights violations during Peru’s armed conflict and ties to Peru’s reactionary right – hardly something that the protesters will accept. Recently, Peru Libre, Vladimir Cerrón’s party, has tried to unsuccessfully censure Williams Zapata’s chairmanship, in order to secure it for itself. While this would be accepted by the protesters, it would also place the Presidency in the hands of the same authoritarians that doomed Castillo’s government to begin with. Short term solutions are, therefore, not easy to find. One mid to long-term solution...

attacks, but I still think the term “terrorist” is perfectly appropriate for this situation. The attackers indiscriminately killed and injured civilians in a train station, and there seems plenty of evidence that it is motivated by politics and ideology. To be sure, the international definition of terrorism remains contested, but the US law definition seems applicable. the term “international terrorism” means activities that— (A) involve violent acts or acts dangerous to human life that are a violation of the criminal laws of the United States or of any State, or...

...“consular access” or “fair trial.” On this point, India can argue that the term “consular access” used in Article 36 of the VCCR should be interpreted to include private or confidential conversations with Jadhav. Pakistan would, of course, deny such conversations, as it has been doing so, because it believes that such conversations are outside the scope of Article 36. Thus, it gives rise to a difference of opinion as to the interpretation of the term consular access. Third and most importantly, for India to satisfy the complete jurisdictional requirements...

the government obstructed the work of human rights organizations, looking to de-legitimize them. Similarly, opponents frequently accused him of harassment through use of spurious judicial charges. For many, including close supporters, Morales had “distorted his essence” by pursuing a policy of “the ends justify the means”. The final straw came when Morales refused to acknowledge defeat in a 2016 referendum. 51.3% of Bolivians refused to approve a constitutional amendment eliminating presidential term limitations. Morales vowed not to respect the results, arguing before the Constitutional Tribunal that term limitations were contrary...

[Adriana Rudling is a  Post-Doctoral Researcher at the Chr Michelsen Institute, Bergen Norway. Post-Doctoral Visiting Fellow at the Instituto Pensar, Bogota, Colombia working on issues relating to the interactions between victims and transitional justice mechanisms.] Eduardo González Cueva once told me the worst thing that can happen to a truth commission is that nobody talks about it, that it goes by unnoticed. This has certainly not been the case of the Colombian Commission for Clarification of Truth, Coexistence, and Guarantees of Non-Repetition, known locally as the CEV, so far. The...

[Dimitrios A. Kourtis, is a PhD candidate Aristotle University, Research Associate, Adjunct Lecturer, University of Nicosia.] Photo credits: Flickr, z@doune, CC Attribution 2.0 Generic. The Armenian Remembrance Day (24 April) marks the commemoration of the tragic events that took place against the Armenian population of the Ottoman Empire in 1915. The persecutions, massacres, forceful deportations, and attempts to terrorize the Ottoman Armenian communities have been classified as genocide by historians (see indicatively Dadrian, Akçam 2019/2018/2012, Bloxham, Hovannisian) and at least certain legal scholars (de Zayas, Garibian, Kielsgard) although not necessarily...

covering several hundred square kilometres, or ‘long-lasting’, defined as having a duration of several months or about a season, especially since in the assessment of such effects there would always be a large subjective element.” The UN Environment Programme (UNEP) has criticized it as both too stringent and too imprecise; the ICRC would also apply a different standard. The UN Compensation Commission, operating under Security Council Resolution 687 and in a context where the respondent was not a party to the treaties, declined to apply “widespread, long-term and/or severe” as...

..."police action." (Korea, too.) So, no, the history books do not need to be rewritten. In IHL, war is a term of art -- referring to declared wars between states. It was that use of "war" to which Cassese was referring, as the article Ryan links to makes clear. War is also, of course, an obsolete term of art, the last formal declaration of war taking place in 1945 when Russia formally declared war on Japan. Daniel Davies Thanks for addressing this shortcoming in Mr. Goodman's entertaining analysis. To further...

It is not often that the U.S. President and his chief trade representative debate fine points of international law in the Oval Office in front of the world’s press and senior Chinese officials. But President Trump and the U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer did just that last Friday when they publicly debated whether the possible US-China trade deal would be called a “memorandum of understanding” (MOU) or a “trade agreement.” Here is the exchange, per Bloomberg. Trump told gathered reporters that the memorandums would “be very short term. I don’t...

points to a specific problem that is not easily conveyed by any other term. Its broader meaning is not foreign to the history and common use of the term. The very word impunity emerged from a context of abuse of power and structural discrimination in Latin America. Indeed, it is because impunity has historically been associated with abuses of power or structures of political inequality that the term has a strong rhetorical force. This force is important because it mobilizes institutional change and provides legitimacy. Why should we allow a...

is the act by which a legal norm is identified; content determination consists in defining the meaning of this norm. Even if they are often intermingled and complementary in practice, these two operations are conceptually distinct. Importantly, the entanglement of law ascertainment and content determination in practice does not allow us to conclude that CIL cannot be interpreted. Law ascertainment and content determination go hand in hand, yes, but interpretation is always necessary. Two interpreters may agree about the existence of a norm of CIL on a specific matter, but...

might seem like an obvious point to make, but it does appear to be forgotten in a lot, if not most of discussions on jus post bellum. This is illustrated in discourse and policy, for example, in what is, in my opinion, the over-emphasis on the role of civil society in providing basic social services, which should clearly be noted to be a short term solution, rather than a serious long term alternative to state institutions. There is one challenge to my claim that sovereignty-related issues are underappreciated that I...