...assumption that “states cannot effectively ensure respect for their human rights obligations abroad unless constitutional rights also extend
extraterritorially.” He questions this assumption, and suggests that some
extraterritorial regulation of state agent conduct could be done for example by statute, rather than through constitutional means. This raises important and interesting questions of institutional competence and, as Pierre-Hugues indicates, “self-compliance” by states (which I consider briefly, e.g., p. 111). To a large extent, delineating the
extraterritorial reach of domestic rights also defines the role of domestic courts in enforcing those rights...