Logo Logo Logo Logo Logo

In association with the International Commission of Jurists

  • Topics ↓
    • General
    • Use of Force
    • International Criminal Law
    • International Humanitarian Law
    • International Human Rights Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Trade & Economic Law
    • Law of the Sea
    • National Security Law
    • Foreign Relations Law
    • Organizations
  • Regions ↓
    • Africa
    • Asia-Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin & South America
    • Middle East
    • North America
  • Announcements ↓
    • Events
    • Calls for Papers
    • Jobs
  • Symposia ↓
    • Books
    • Articles
    • Themes
  • Media ↓
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Contributors
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Donate
  • Fresh Squeezed! Podcast
  • Topics ↓

    • General
    • Use of Force
    • International Criminal Law
    • International Humanitarian Law
    • International Human Rights Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Trade & Economic Law
    • Law of the Sea
    • National Security Law
    • Foreign Relations Law
    • Organizations
  • Regions ↓

    • Africa
    • Asia-Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin & South America
    • Middle East
    • North America
  • Announcements ↓

    • Events
    • Calls for Papers
    • Jobs
  • Symposia ↓

    • Books
    • Articles
    • Themes
  • Media ↓
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Contributors
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Donate
  • Fresh Squeezed! Podcast

Author: Jay Thomas

08 Feb

Litigation Beyond the Technological Frontier: Voda v. Cordis and Claims of Foreign Patent Infringement

[Jay Thomas is a professor at Georgetown University Law Center where he teaches, among other things, international intellectual property law.] The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently held that a U.S. district court did not possess subject matter jurisdiction over assertions of foreign patent infringement. In Voda v. Coris Corp., the Federal Circuit rejected the district...

Jay Thomas | 0 Comments
Recent Posts
  • Symposium on the CCW GGE LAWS: Obstacles Avoided? Rolling Towards Consensus for the 2026 GGE LAWS Report
  • National Security Abroad, Constitutional Rights at Home: United States Sanctions Against the ICC and the Ensuing Legal Challenges
  • The Interpretation of ‘Abeyance’ in Pakistan v. India: An Inconclusive Finding Unsound in Doctrine and Policy
  • Return on Whose Terms? What The Gambia v. Myanmar Should Say About Going Home
  • Symposium on the CCW GGE LAWS: You Can’t Always Get What You Want–The (D)evolution of Responsibility and Accountability

© Opinio Juris | Design by Open & Honest | In association with the International Commission of Jurists