No, Prof. Dershowitz, Tell Us What You Really Think of Richard Goldstone

No, Prof. Dershowitz, Tell Us What You Really Think of Richard Goldstone

Alan Dershowitz has never been shy to express his views, but I think he may be going a bit far here in reaction to recent stories about Judge Richard Goldstone’s service to the Apartheid regime in South Africa.

Goldstone was–quite literally–a hanging judge. He imposed and affirmed death sentences for more than two dozen blacks under circumstances where whites would almost certainly have escaped the noose. And he affirmed sentences of physical torture–euphemistically called “flogging”– for other blacks. He also enforced miscegenation and other racist laws with nary a word of criticism or dissent. He was an important part of the machinery of death, torture and racial subjugation that characterized Apartheid South Africa. His robe and gavel lent an air of legitimacy to an entirely illegitimate and barbaric regime.

It is no surprise that Goldstone kept this part of his life secret from academic colleagues, friends and the general public. I recall him at the lunch and dinner tables in Cambridge describing himself as a heroic part of the struggle against Apartheid.  Now it turns out he was the ugly face of Apartheid, covering its sins and crimes with a judicial robe. How differently we would have looked at him if we knew that he had climbed the judicial ladder on whipped backs and hanged bodies.

Dershowitz then goes on:

Goldstone  is an ambitious opportunist who lacks the courage of his convictions– if he ever had any. He has always put personal advancement over principle. He is a master of rationalization and self justification. This time he has run out of excuses. He’s been exposed as a poseur who will sell his integrity for a careerist opportunity. Fortunately he now has little integrity left to sell.

Yikes!  This is way, way over the top, especially on the integrity part. I don’t think there is any evidence Goldstone tried to hide any of this.

On the other hand, buried beneath the outrage is a very good point. Goldstone, like many other white South Africans, was complicit in aspects of the Apartheid regime.  This doesn’t necessarily make him a bad person, but it is certainly a difficult, morally ambiguous situation. And many of Goldstone’s defenders are they type who wouldn’t see this as a difficult, morally ambiguous situation.  Rather, they would think of an Alien Tort Statute lawsuit.  Luckily, those folks are Judge Goldstone’s friends…

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Topics
General
Notify of
Joe
Joe

Wow.  Strong words.  Why do you think they are too much, exactly?  If Goldstone did actually give those rulings, then wouldn’t they support Dershowitz’s outrage here?

robert
robert

… and, of course, none of this would have been written if Goldstone had produced a report that completely exhonorated the Israeli Government and blamed it entirely on the Palestinians.

It’s all part of a campaign.

Nathan Wagner
Nathan Wagner

It doesn’t come across whether your “This doesn’t necessarily make him a bad person” is a facetious setup to your dig against the modern ATS usage proponents among Goldstone’s friends or whether you actually believe that serving as a judge and imposing unequal justice in apartheid South Africa – to the point of “flogging” and death – really was “a difficult, morally ambiguous situation” that precisely because of its moral ambiguity (not because of your quibbles about universal jurisdiction) oughtn’t to be second-guessed by a distant tribunal.

Ali
Ali

I wonder why anyone in this world takes a  shameless propagandist like Dershowitz seriously.

Francesco Messineo
Francesco Messineo

Ali, I wish I knew. Might it have anything to do with his chair at Harvard Law School?  I’d be more prepared to listen to his arguments if ‘rationalization and self justification’ played no role at all in Dershowitz’s role as an advocate of torture warrants.

I also wonder whether Dershowitz and other intrepid analyzers of their enemies’ pasts have any view on the application of the death penalty in the United States, its disproportionate application in terms of ethnic and social background, etc. etc.. There must be more recent stuff, but I remember this one in particular as a good report on this topic: Amnesty International, ‘Killing with Prejudice: Race and the Death Penalty in the USA’, 1 May 1999, AI-Index AMR 51/052/1999. Discrimination is discrimination wherever it occurs, even if apartheid South Africa is obviously not comparable to the United States.

The death penalty, either by hanging or by lethal injection, is among the most horrible uses of state power – just below torture in my book.

Ali
Ali

Francesco
 Few years back, when Dershowitz wrote his book “the case for Israel”-I am thinking,  as in the case why Israel should continue to violate international laws, torturing and killing Palestinians- he refused to appear with me on a TV station to promote his book, because he was not interested in having mere mortals question or debate his arguments.  The TV station, bravely, canceled his appearance.