Logo Logo Logo Logo Logo

In association with the International Commission of Jurists

  • Topics ↓
    • General
    • Use of Force
    • International Criminal Law
    • International Humanitarian Law
    • International Human Rights Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Trade & Economic Law
    • Law of the Sea
    • National Security Law
    • Foreign Relations Law
    • Organizations
  • Regions ↓
    • Africa
    • Asia-Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin & South America
    • Middle East
    • North America
  • Announcements ↓
    • Events
    • Calls for Papers
    • Jobs
  • Symposia ↓
    • Books
    • Articles
    • Themes
  • Media ↓
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Contributors
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Donate
  • Fresh Squeezed! Podcast
  • Topics ↓

    • General
    • Use of Force
    • International Criminal Law
    • International Humanitarian Law
    • International Human Rights Law
    • Environmental Law
    • Trade & Economic Law
    • Law of the Sea
    • National Security Law
    • Foreign Relations Law
    • Organizations
  • Regions ↓

    • Africa
    • Asia-Pacific
    • Europe
    • Latin & South America
    • Middle East
    • North America
  • Announcements ↓

    • Events
    • Calls for Papers
    • Jobs
  • Symposia ↓

    • Books
    • Articles
    • Themes
  • Media ↓
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
  • Contributors
  • Submissions
  • About
  • Donate
  • Fresh Squeezed! Podcast

Opinio Juris (Plus One) Takes on Professor Michael Stokes Paulsen

03 Oct Opinio Juris (Plus One) Takes on Professor Michael Stokes Paulsen

03.10.09 | 0 Comments

In the inaugural issue of the Yale Law Journal Online, the new online companion to the Yale Law Journal, Peggy McGuinness, Peter Spiro, Robert Ahdieh and I respond to Professor Michael Stokes Paulsen’s recent article:  “The Constitutional Power to Interpret International Law.” All of us are critical, although in different ways. I am the most sympathetic to Paulsen, but even I have some disagreements.

Topics
General

Share

  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

Related

No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

About Author

Julian Ku

Recent Posts
  • Pushed Back from Europe and Its Human Rights Court: Evidence of Lawless Expulsions Before the UN Human Rights Committee
  • Events and Announcements: 1 November 2026
  • Neutral Is Not Infinitesimal: The ICC Prosecution’s Response in Yekatom and the Missing Content of a ‘Normative’ Threshold
  • Which Women Are Worth Protecting? A Feminist Response to the UN Special Rapporteur’s on VAW Letter on Mexico’s Feminicide Law
  • What About the Parents of Child Soldiers? Passive Complicity and the Ayada K. Case

© Opinio Juris | Design by Open & Honest | In association with the International Commission of Jurists