US-Mexico Fence Could Be an Ecological Disaster

US-Mexico Fence Could Be an Ecological Disaster

President Bush signed a bill yesterday authorizing the construction of a 700 mile fence along the U.S.-Mexico border. The fence, of course, is very controversial, opposed not only by Mexico — outgoing President Vicente Fox has called it “shameful” and likened it to the Berlin wall — but also by the national union representing Border Patrol agents, the National Border Patrol Council, which believes it will be ineffective.

I don’t have much to add to that debate. I just want to point out that there is another aspect of the wall that is cause for concern, one that has received almost no attention: the significant ecological harm it will cause.

Environmentalists and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wardens say the barrier would disrupt the migration of scores of species from jaguars to hawks and humming birds along a wildlife corridor linking northern Mexico and the U.S. southwest known as the “Sky Islands.”

The chain of 40 mountain ranges links the northern range of tropical species such as the jaguar and the parrot in the Mexican Sierra Madre Mountains, and the southern limit of temperate animals such as the black bear and the Mexican wolf in the U.S. Rocky Mountains.

“Bisecting the area with an impermeable barrier such as a double reinforced wall or fence could really have a devastating effect on these species,” said Matt Skroch, a wildlife biologist and executive director of the environmental non-profit group Sky Island Alliance in Tucson, Arizona.

“If they build it, we could really say goodbye to the future of jaguars in the United States,” he added.

[snip]

The proposal under consideration by Congress would replace a patchy, chest-high barbed wire fence that cuts across the wilderness areas of the southwest with large sweeps of continuous double barrier fencing topped with bright lights.

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service wardens in Arizona say the planned barrier would impact the fragile desert ecosystem, and could also harm migratory birds such as Gray and Swainson hawks and Rufous hummingbirds that soar over it.

“The fence would have a negative effect on everything from the insects that would now be flying around the lights instead of pollinating the cactuses, to the birds that eat them, right up to the large predators like the jaguars,” said William Radke, the manager of the San Bernardino National Wildlife Refuge, east of Douglas, Arizona.

Radke said the fence would prevent snakes and turtles, as well as wild turkeys and road runners from crossing. In addition, the bright lights at the top of the tall fence would interfere with birds’ ability to navigate by the stars.

“A lot of migratory birds actually migrate at night, using stellar navigation and the moon to navigate. Suddenly lighting them up may disrupt a bird’s ability to feed and rest and it may impact its survivability later on,” he added.

Radke said the planned barrier would also sever the rugged highland trails used by “pioneer” jaguars currently crossing from Mexico and repopulating the rugged Peloncillo mountains east of Douglas after decades of absence.

The spotted cats originally roamed the Americas from Argentina in the south, to the Grand Canyon, in northern Arizona, but vanished from the United States several decades ago due to hunting and pressure from human encroachment on their habitat.

“The jaguars and a lot of the other wildlife that pioneer north from Mexico are coming here because their habitats are filling up down there,” Radke said.

“If we cut off that access they are going to be restricted to areas where they are going to be in conflict with their own populations, it would have a negative impact,” he added.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Topics
General
Notify of
Kdreger

Ok, the wall will make some animals go around it, big deal, nature provides it’s animals with the means to survive or perish! If you have actually seen what these border crossers are dumping on the land that surrounds the border, both on the USA &Mexico side you would say that a fence is a great idea to keep them away!

I have picked up many a trash bag full of litter along our southern border, and want to let you know I am in favor of any fence that can keep people who have no regard for our environment away from our country!

Maybe Greenpeace or some tree hugger group should step in and come down to asses the actual properties along the border to see the trash, bottles, cans, clothes that are left behind by these border crossers!Here is an open invite, come on down….

Cesare Romano
Cesare Romano

Actually, it might be the opposite of an environmental disaster. I remember reading an article in national geographic a few years ago aboyut the DMZ between the Koreas, the WALL par excellence. Well, it turns out to be a heaven for all species who have lost their habitats north and south due to farming and urbanization. No one disturbs them there.

So, paradoxically, the environmental problem here is due to the fact that that the wall is not complete and filled dof land mines like in Korea. In a DMZ like zone the all wild specied could find a place to prosper. 😉 Shall we let the administration know?

John
John

In North Korea, the no-man’s land between the two countries has become a safe haven for wildlife. However I don’t believe the wall with Mexico would include any kind of no-man’s land. Even if it did, it probably wouldn’t be causing any significant regeression of urban sprawl. I wonder how it could be of any help.

To Kdreger:

It’s quite sad that the diverse fauna of the American South is less important than your trash. Consider the problem like this instead: without coyotes and roadrunners, you’d be missing a great Sunday cartoon.

Nom
Nom

That the union representing border patrol agents would oppose a border wall should be as big a surprise as a union representing supermarket cashiers opposing self-scanning checkouts. Its pure protectionism and Ludditism.

Matthew Gross
Matthew Gross

I’m unsure what method of increasing border security would not have a ecologically negative impact. Increased patrols by border patrols would also be distruptive. Observational ballons and flights might not be as much as an issue, but aren’t an enforcement method unto themselves.

Raising ecological objections to a fence designed to prevent illegal human migration through delicate terrain seems suspiciously like blaming the victim, however.

Kevin Heller
Kevin Heller

“Raising ecological objections to a fence designed to prevent illegal human migration through delicate terrain seems suspiciously like blaming the victim, however.”

How, exactly? The fence is the problem, not the migrants — who have, of course, been traversing that land for a very long time. As have border patrol agents. So the only ones blaming the victims here are conservatives who want to build the fence in the first place.