10 Apr Review of Joshua Sobol’s “iWitness”
As the Nazis organized Austria, Jägerstätter had to decide whether to allow himself to be drafted by the German army and thus collaborate with Nazism. Two seemingly good reasons were given to him, sometimes by spiritual advisers, why he should not resist. First, he was told, he had to consider his family. The other argument was that he had a responsibility to obey legitimate authorities. The political authorities were the ones liable to judgment for their decisions, not ordinary citizens. Jägerstätter rejected both arguments. In normal times, of course, obedience to authority may be required even when we disagree on certain policies. But the 1940s in Austria were not normal times: to obey for obedience’s sake would have been to do what Adolf Eichmann would later plead in his trial in Jerusalem — he was just following orders. The consequences of Jägerstätter’s position were obvious: “Everyone tells me, of course, that I should not do what I am doing because of the danger of death. I believe it is better to sacrifice one’s life right away than to place oneself in the grave danger of committing sin and then dying.” But he serenely decided that he could not allow himself to contribute to a regime that was immoral and anti-Catholic. Jägerstätter was sent to the prison in Linz-an-der-Donau, where Hitler and Eichmann had lived as children. According to the prison chaplain, 38 men were executed there, some for desertion, others for resistance similar to Jägerstätter’s (no others have been positively identified)…. His parish priest, his wife and his lawyer all tried to change his mind. But it was useless. On Aug. 9, 1943, he accepted execution, even though he knew it would make no earthly difference to the Nazi death machine.
The play is billed as “[a]n explosive and resonant play, [that] questions our current understanding and acceptance of war, and illustrates the social pressure citizens of every nation feel to support their government’s involvement in wars.” But in truth the precise issue is the role of conscientious objectors in societies that impose conscription. Obviously, this has far more relevance to Sobol’s home country of Israel and any number of other countries that impose the draft than it does to a country like the United States with an all-volunteer military. Indeed, the role of conscientious objectors is a subject that rarely is discussed in a country that lacks conscription, and the role of “selective conscientious objectors”–such as Jägerstätter–who are not opposed to all war but simply immoral ones, is discussed with even greater infrequency.
Sobol’s character Franz sees himself as a witness to the atrocities committed by the Nazi regime and a witness to their refusal to see or admit their acts of atrocity. Sobol uses this story to explore matters of conscientious objection: What does it mean to refuse to participate in military service? How does one uphold one’s convictions in the face of peer pressure, government action and legal punishment? What does it mean to believe in something so strongly, to the point of risking death?
If you have a chance to see the play, I would encourage you to do so. Even if, like me, your moral persuasions do not typically lean toward conscientious objection, it is a play that is worthy of your attention. iWitness runs until May 21, 2006 in Los Angeles. The teaching material about the play is available here, the teacher’s manual is here, and the program is here.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.