05 Dec ATS Lawsuit Against Haitian Colonel Goes Forward
The case is important for two reasons. First, it reaffirmed the equitable tolling of the statute of limitations in cases involving grave human rights abuses. “Congress acknowledged that plaintiffs face unique impediments such as reprisals from death squads and immunity of high-ranking government officials in bringing human rights litigation. Litigation will often not be possible until there has been a regime change in the plaintiff’s country of origin, after which the plaintiff can investigate and compile evidence without fear of reprisals against him, his family and witnesses… The pattern and practice of torture, mass murder, intimidation and reprisals against perceived opponents of the government during the military regime in Haiti from 1991 to 1994 as alleged in [the] complaint clearly qualify as extraordinary circumstances….”
Second, it ruled that the plaintiffs were not required to exhaust available remedies in Haiti. It declined to apply the exhaustion of remedies requirement for ATS claims. As for their TVPA claims, the court found that defendants had not satisfied their burden of showing that plaintiffs had not exhausted available remedies under the TVPA. The facts are complicated because in November 2000 a Haitian tribunal found Dorélien responsible for the massacre the led to Pierre’s death, but that since that time Dorélien has been freed from prison and returned to power. As such, this Haitian judgment is currently ineffective and unenforceable in Haiti.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.