Can You Be Pro-Free Trade and Anti-Investor State Dispute Settlement?
Simon Lester of Worldtradelaw.net and the Cato Institute offered a very interesting pro-free trade argument against the inclusion of investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) in trade agreements like the TransPacific Partnership or the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. I disagree and we discussed and debated the issue today in a lively conversation hosted by Columbia University’s Center for Sustainable Investment.
Copy and paste this URL into your WordPress site to embed
Copy and paste this code into your site to embed